...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering >Inversion of multimegameter-range acoustic data for ocean temperature
【24h】

Inversion of multimegameter-range acoustic data for ocean temperature

机译:数百万米范围的海洋温度反演数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ocean sound speed (a surrogate for temperature) derived from the ray travel times obtained from acoustic transmissions may be inaccurate when the reference ocean state is inadequate for linearized inversion. When the reference (e.g., the Levitus ocean atlas) is significantly different from the "true" ocean, the reference ray paths inaccurately represent the true sampling. In addition, natural oceanic variations, such as the evolution of a summer mixed layer, can significantly change the ray sampling over time. The guiding principle for inversion is that ray travel times associated with the inverse solution must match the measured travel times. A time-dependent reference ocean can reduce both the nonlinearities and the solution uncertainties since the model variances may be assumed to be less. The Levitus ocean atlas was employed to explore the effects of nonlinearities when inverting multimegameter-range acoustic data and to find accurate inversion methods. These methods were applied to acoustic data obtained in the North Pacific during the acoustic thermometry of ocean climate (ATOC) project using an acoustic source on Pioneer Seamount off the coast of California. In order to linearize the inversions, the annual cycle was removed by referencing the measured travel times to travel times computed using the Levitus monthly ocean atlas. This linearization results in a more accurate time series of range- and depth-averaged temperatures, but the solution for range- and depth-averaged temperature is only slightly different from that using a time-independent set of rays. Standard uncertainties for the 0-1000-m depth-averaged temperature are typically /spl plusmn/0.012/spl deg/C, while the annual peak to-peak temperature variation is about 0.4/spl deg/C. Because the travel time data are inherently averaging, the time series of range- and depth averaged temperature is insensitive to different assumptions made in the forward model, such as the model parameterization, variances, wavenumber spectra, and the data uncertainties.
机译:当参考海洋状态不足以进行线性化反演时,从声音传输获得的射线传播时间得出的海洋声速(温度的替代物)可能不准确。当参考(例如Levitus海洋图集)与“真实”海洋明显不同时,参考射线路径将不准确地代表真实采样。此外,自然的海洋变化(例如夏季混合层的演变)会随着时间的推移显着改变射线采样。反演的指导原则是与反解关联的射线传播时间必须与测得的传播时间匹配。时间相关的参考海洋可以减少非线性和解决方案的不确定性,因为可以假设模型方差较小。使用Levitus海洋图集来探索对数百万米范围的声学数据进行反演时非线性的影响,并找到准确的反演方法。这些方法被应用于在加利福尼亚气候下的先锋海山上使用声源的海洋气候声测温(ATOC)项目期间在北太平洋获得的声数据。为了使反演线性化,通过将测得的旅行时间与使用Levitus月度海洋地图集计算的旅行时间相关联,删除了年度周期。这种线性化导致范围和深度平均温度的时间序列更准确,但是范围和深度平均温度的解决方案与使用时间独立的射线组的解决方案仅略有不同。 0-1000-m深度平均温度的标准不确定度通常为/ spl plusmn / 0.012 / spl deg / C,而年度峰到峰温度变化约为0.4 / spl deg / C。由于旅行时间数据本质上是平均的,因此范围和深度平均温度的时间序列对正向模型中做出的不同假设(例如模型参数化,方差,波数谱和数据不确定性)不敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号