首页> 外文期刊>Ocean Development & International Law >Territorial Sea Baselines along Ice-Covered Coasts: International Practice and Limits of the Law of the Sea
【24h】

Territorial Sea Baselines along Ice-Covered Coasts: International Practice and Limits of the Law of the Sea

机译:覆冰海岸的领海基线:国际惯例和海洋法的界限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article considers the relevant international law pertaining to territorial sea baselines and reviews the application of that law to ice-covered coasts. The international literature concerning the status of ice in international law is examined and state practice for both the Arctic and Antarctic is reviewed. The Law of the Sea Convention contains virtually no provisions pertaining to ice, as during its negotiation, in an effort to reach a consensus, all discussion of Antarctica was avoided. International lawyers appear to favour the notion that where ice persists for many years and is fixed to land or at least is connected to ice that is connected to land, it may be able to generate territorial sea baselines. Neither the International Court of Justice nor any other international tribunal has had the opportunity to consider the status of ice, except in the most general terms. This article considers some alternatives and difficulties in their application. The impact of the Antarctic Treaty on any system is also considered, as Articles Ⅳ and Ⅵ of the Treaty may be affected by any international action by claimants in proclaiming baselines.
机译:本文考虑了与领海基线有关的相关国际法,并回顾了该法在冰雪覆盖的海岸中的应用。审查了有关冰在国际法中的地位的国际文献,并审查了北极和南极的国家实践。 《海洋法公约》实际上没有任何关于冰的规定,因为在谈判过程中,为达成共识,避免了对南极洲的所有讨论。国际律师似乎赞成这样一种观念,即如果冰层持续存在多年并固定在陆地上,或者至少与与陆地相连的冰层相连,那么它就有可能产生领海基线。除了最一般的说法,国际法院和任何其他国际法庭都没有机会审议冰的地位。本文考虑了一些替代方法和应用中的困难。还考虑了《南极条约》对任何制度的影响,因为条约的第四条和第六条可能受到索赔人宣布基准线的任何国际行动的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号