首页> 外文期刊>Ocean Development & International Law >The Robin Hood Narrative: A Discussion of Empirical and Ethical Legitimizations of Somali Pirates
【24h】

The Robin Hood Narrative: A Discussion of Empirical and Ethical Legitimizations of Somali Pirates

机译:罗宾汉的叙事:关于索马里海盗的经验和伦理合法化的讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The pirates of Somalia pose a major challenge for the international community, both economically and morally. Somali pirates try to legitimize their actions by reference to a number of arguments that appeal to the international community. Allegedly, the illegal fishing and waste dumping in Somali waters were the triggers for piracy. Hence, the pirates want to protect their coasts. These various strands form the so-called legitimacy Robin Hood narrative. In this article, this narrative is critically examined. The analysis includes a discussion of justice theories and related claims based on the works of John Rawls and Thomas Pogge. This is followed by a discussion of the justification of violence using Nicholas Fotion's irregular just war theory.
机译:索马里的海盗从经济上和道德上对国际社会构成了重大挑战。索马里海盗试图通过参考一些吸引国际社会的论点来使自己的行为合法化。据称,在索马里水域的非法捕鱼和废物倾倒是海盗的诱因。因此,海盗想保护自己的海岸。这些不同的分支构成了所谓的合法性罗宾汉的叙述。在本文中,对该叙述进行了严格审查。分析包括基于约翰·罗尔斯和托马斯·波格的著作对正义理论和相关主张的讨论。接下来是使用尼古拉斯·福廷(Nicholas Fotion)的非常规正义战争理论来讨论暴力的正当性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号