首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >How to include ecological network analysis results in management? A case study of three tidal basins of the Wadden Sea, south-eastern North Sea
【24h】

How to include ecological network analysis results in management? A case study of three tidal basins of the Wadden Sea, south-eastern North Sea

机译:如何将生态网络分析结果纳入管理?以北海东南部瓦登海的三个潮汐盆地为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ecological network analysis (ENA) is an efficient tool to conduct holistic evaluation of the functioning and structure of ecosystems. ENA results can be used to support management decisions, but further development is needed to improve ENA application. We compared the food web functioning of three areas of the Wadden Sea: the Sylt-Romo Bight, the Norderaue tidal basin and the Jade Bay, and present an example application of ENA indices in decision making processes. We used a sequential increase in uniform uncertainty from 50% to 99% using 10% increments to evaluate the robustness of the network comparisons. The results showed that the Jade Bay differed in its system functioning from the Sylt-Romo Bight and the Norderaue tidal basin which represent the Northern Wadden Sea. The Jade Bay system, which is dominated by mudflats, had a heavier reliance on detritivory pathways, while the Northern Wadden Sea, which is dominated by Arenicola-sand flats, relied more on exchanges with the North Sea. Higher recycling, redundant pathways and flow diversity in the Jade Bay indicated that this system is probably more resilient against external perturbations than the Northern Wadden Sea systems which are more organized and specialized. This was related to the high standing stocks of suspension feeders in the Northern Wadden Sea, resulting from the establishment of several invasive suspension feeders, such as the Pacific oysters, the American razor clams and the common slipper shell. This study showed that 1 uncertainty analyses are crucial for the interpretation of ENA results and their use in management, 2- temporal measurable trends of indices which are robust to model uncertainty would be more appropriate for decision making than single reference values, 3- using ENA for assessment purposes in the Wadden Sea must be based on several representative sites taking into account their habitat types as well as morphological and physical characteristics, in terms of water depth, hydrodynamics and degree of enclosure of back barrier areas.
机译:生态网络分析(ENA)是对生态系统功能和结构进行整体评估的有效工具。 ENA结果可用于支持管理决策,但是需要进一步开发以改善ENA应用。我们比较了瓦登海三个地区的食物网功能:叙尔特-罗莫海岸线,诺德赖岛潮汐盆地和玉湾,并提供了ENA指数在决策过程中的示例应用。我们使用统一不确定性从50%到99%的顺序增加(使用10%的增量)来评估网络比较的稳健性。结果表明,翡翠湾的系统功能不同于代表北瓦登海的叙尔特罗莫湾和诺德赖潮汐盆地。以滩涂为主的翡翠湾系统更加依赖于破坏性通道,而以阿雷尼科拉沙地为主的北瓦登海则更多地依赖与北海的交往。翡翠湾较高的回收利用,多余的路径和流量的多样性表明,与更有组织和专门化的北瓦登海系统相比,该系统对外部干扰的抵御能力更大。这与北瓦登海中悬浮饲料的高存量有关,这是由于建立了几种侵入性悬浮饲料,例如太平洋牡蛎,美洲剃刀蛤和普通的拖鞋壳。这项研究表明1不确定性分析对于ENA结果的解释及其在管理中的应用至关重要,2对模型不确定性具有鲁棒性的指标的时间可衡量趋势比单个参考值更适合决策,3使用ENA为了在瓦登海进行评估,必须基于几个代表性地点,考虑到它们的栖息地类型以及形态和物理特征,包括水深,流体动力学和后屏障区域的围封程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号