【24h】

Freedom for the individual?

机译:个人自由?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the apparently big changes proposed by the Lofstedt Review is a move to exempt altogether from health and safety law the genuinely self-employed who are working alone. In the terms in which it was expressed in the review, this change seems sensible. On the other hand, not only RoSPA and IOSH but the TUC and many others in the H&S community have sounded a note of caution that such a move, if not handled correctly, could actually lead to a reduction in standards, if not an increase in injuries and work-related ill health.
机译:Lofstedt评论所提出的表面上的重大变化之一是,此举完全免除了健康和安全法,这些法令使真正独自工作的个体劳动者得以独身。用审查中表达的措辞来看,这种变化似乎是明智的。另一方面,不仅RoSPA和IOSH,而且TUC和H&S社区中的许多其他组织都发出了警告,如果不正确处理,此举实际上可能导致标准降低,甚至不能提高标准。受伤和与工作有关的健康不良。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号