...
首页> 外文期刊>Occupational Health [at Work] >TEA-BREAKER POLL: MANDATORY COVID-19 VACCINES FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE STAFF?
【24h】

TEA-BREAKER POLL: MANDATORY COVID-19 VACCINES FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE STAFF?

机译:Tea-Breaker Poll:强制性Covid-19卫生和社会护理人员的疫苗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

By 9 May 2021, nearly one-fifth (17.9%) of staff working in adult care homes in England had yet to receive their first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, despite being one of the highest-priority groups for vaccination1. By comparison, nearly all care home residents had been vaccinated, with just 5.1% not having received their first dose. In a separate study, care home staff state 'concerns about lack of vaccine research' among the key reasons for vaccine non-compliance2. In April, the government launched a consultation on making mandatory COVID-19 vaccination a condition of deployment in older adult care homes3. It proposed amending the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 so that older adult care home providers could use only staff who had either received a COVID-19 vaccination or had a legitimate medical exemption.The TUC is against compulsory vaccination, arguing that such a measure would be 'counterproductive'4.The Royal College of Nursing5 and UNISON6 are also opposed to mandatory vaccines.
机译:截至2021年5月9日,在英格兰成人护理家庭工作的近五分之一(17.9%)尚未收到他们的第一剂Covid-19疫苗,尽管是疫苗接种的最高优先级之一。相比之下,几乎所有护理家庭居民都接种了疫苗,只有5.1%的人没有收到他们的第一剂。在一个单独的研究中,护理家庭员工州的疫苗研究缺乏疫苗研究的担忧,疫苗非规定的主要原因2。 4月,政府启动了关于制定强制性Covid-19疫苗接种的咨询,在老年人护理家庭中部署部署3。它建议修改2008年的健康和社会护理法案(规定的活动)条例2014,使年龄较大的成人护理家庭提供者只能使用已接受Covid-19疫苗接种的工作人员或具有合法的医疗豁免.TUC是针对强制性疫苗接种,争论这种措施是“反补实”的4.皇家护理学院和联盟6也反对强制性疫苗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号