首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Technology >AMBIENT DOSE EQUIVALENT VERSUS EFFECTIVE DOSE FOR QUANTIFYING STRAY RADIATION EXPOSURES TO A PATIENT RECEIVING PROTON THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
【24h】

AMBIENT DOSE EQUIVALENT VERSUS EFFECTIVE DOSE FOR QUANTIFYING STRAY RADIATION EXPOSURES TO A PATIENT RECEIVING PROTON THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER

机译:用于量化前列腺癌患者接受质子治疗的杂散辐射照射量的等效剂量对有效剂量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the quantity ambient dose equivalent H~*(10) as a conservative estimate of effective dose E for estimating stray radiation exposures to patients receiving passively scattered proton radiotherapy for cancer of the prostate. H~*(10), which is determined from fluence free-in-air, is potentially useful because it is simpler to measure or calculate because it avoids the complexities associated with phantoms or patient anatomy. However, the suitability of H~*(10) as a surrogate for E has not been demonstrated for exposures to high-energy neutrons emanating from radiation treatments with proton beams. The suitability was tested by calculating H~*(10) and E for a proton treatment using a Monte Carlo model of a double-rnscattering treatment machine and a computerized anthropomorphic phantom. The calculated E for the simulated treatment was 5.5 mSv/Gy, while the calculated H~*(10) at the isocenter was 10 mSv/Gy. A sensitivity analysis revealed that H~*(10) conservatively estimated E for the interval of treatment parameters common in proton therapy for prostate cancer. However, sensitivity analysis of a broader interval of parameters suggested that H~*(10) may underestimate E for treatments of other sites, particularly those that require large field sizes. Simulations revealed that while E was predominated by neutrons generated in the nozzle, neutrons produced in the patient contributed up to 40% to dose equivalent in near-field organs.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估环境剂量当量H〜*(10)作为有效剂量E的保守估计的适用性,以估计接受被动分散质子放射治疗的前列腺癌患者的杂散辐射照射量。 H〜*(10)由无注量的空气确定,可能具有实用性,因为它可以避免与体模或患者解剖结构相关的复杂性,因此更易于测量或计算。但是,尚未证明H〜*(10)作为E的替代物是否适合暴露于质子束辐射处理产生的高能中子。通过使用双散射处理机的蒙特卡洛模型和计算机化拟人体模计算质子处理的H〜*(10)和E来测试适用性。模拟处理的计算E为5.5 mSv / Gy,等中心点的H〜*(10)为10 mSv / Gy。敏感性分析表明,H〜*(10)保守估计质子治疗前列腺癌常用治疗参数的时间间隔E。然而,对较宽的参数间隔的敏感性分析表明,H〜*(10)可能会低估E值来处理其他部位,尤其是那些需要大视野的部位。模拟显示,虽然E由喷嘴中产生的中子所占主导地位,但患者体内产生的中子贡献了近场器官中等效剂量的40%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear Technology》 |2009年第1期|173-177|共5页
  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center 1515 Holcombe Boulevard Unit 94, Houston, Texas 77030;

    The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center 1515 Holcombe Boulevard Unit 94, Houston, Texas 77030;

    The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center 1515 Holcombe Boulevard Unit 94, Houston, Texas 77030;

    The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center 1515 Holcombe Boulevard Unit 94, Houston, Texas 77030;

    The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center 1515 Holcombe Boulevard Unit 94, Houston, Texas 77030;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    proton therapy; stray radiation; radiation protection;

    机译:质子治疗杂散辐射辐射防护;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:44:14

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号