【24h】

Performance of four digital algorithms for y - y timing with LaBr_3(Ce) scintillators

机译:使用LaBr_3(Ce)闪烁体执行y-y定时的四种数字算法的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Time resolution measurements were performed using four digital timing algorithms and a pair of truncatedcone shaped, 38-mm diameter LaBr3(Ce) fast-timing scintillator detectors. The best resolution [FWHM=143(3) ps] was found for transitions from a Co-60 source when fitting the rising part of sampled waveforms with a cubic polynomial and applying a leading-edge threshold. An average-pulse autocovariance function performed slightly worse [155(3) ps], but was found to be better than digital constant-fraction [178(4) ps] and leading-edge [177(4) ps] algorithms. Use of a Eu-152 source allowed the performance of the four algorithms to be tested across a range of gamma-ray energies with the LaBr3(Ce) detectors. Here the autocovariance algorithm performed best. Changing the sampling speed showed minimal degradation in the time resolution at 20 GS/s, though at 4 GS/s the resolutions were 30-60% worse. These results show that at sampling speeds of 20 or 40 GS/s the time resolutions obtained are close to those reported for analogue pulse-processing electronics. Compared to other works, using slower sampling speeds but higher vertical resolution, slightly worse performance was obtained.
机译:使用四个数字定时算法和一对截头圆锥形,直径38毫米的LaBr3(Ce)快速定时闪烁体探测器进行了时间分辨率测量。当使用三次多项式拟合采样波形的上升部分并应用前沿阈值时,对于从Co-60源进行的转换,发现了最佳分辨率[FWHM = 143(3)ps]。平均脉冲自协方差函数的性能稍差[155(3)ps],但比数字恒定分数[178(4)ps]和前沿算法[177(4)ps]更好。使用Eu-152光源可以使用LaBr3(Ce)探测器在多种伽马射线能量范围内测试这四种算法的性能。在这里,自协方差算法表现最佳。更改采样速度后,时间分辨率在20 GS / s时显示最小的下降,尽管在4 GS / s时,分辨率下降了30-60%。这些结果表明,在20或40 GS / s的采样速度下,所获得的时间分辨率接近于模拟脉冲处理电子设备所报告的时间分辨率。与其他作品相比,使用较低的采样速度但使用较高的垂直分辨率时,获得的性能稍差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号