【24h】

Performance of four digital algorithms for y - y timing with LaBr_3(Ce) scintillators

机译:利用Labr_3(CE)闪烁器的Y - Y时序的四种数字算法的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Time resolution measurements were performed using four digital timing algorithms and a pair of truncatedcone shaped, 38-mm diameter LaBr3(Ce) fast-timing scintillator detectors. The best resolution [FWHM=143(3) ps] was found for transitions from a Co-60 source when fitting the rising part of sampled waveforms with a cubic polynomial and applying a leading-edge threshold. An average-pulse autocovariance function performed slightly worse [155(3) ps], but was found to be better than digital constant-fraction [178(4) ps] and leading-edge [177(4) ps] algorithms. Use of a Eu-152 source allowed the performance of the four algorithms to be tested across a range of gamma-ray energies with the LaBr3(Ce) detectors. Here the autocovariance algorithm performed best. Changing the sampling speed showed minimal degradation in the time resolution at 20 GS/s, though at 4 GS/s the resolutions were 30-60% worse. These results show that at sampling speeds of 20 or 40 GS/s the time resolutions obtained are close to those reported for analogue pulse-processing electronics. Compared to other works, using slower sampling speeds but higher vertical resolution, slightly worse performance was obtained.
机译:使用四个数字时序算法和一对截头寸形状的38mm直径Labr3(CE)快速定时闪烁器检测器进行时间分辨率测量。发现最佳分辨率[FWHM = 143(3)PS]对于使用立方体多项式拟合采样波形的上升部分并施加前沿阈值时,发现来自CO-60源的过渡。平均脉冲自电转移函数略差较差[155(3)PS],但被发现比数字恒定 - 级分[178(4)PS]和前沿[177(4)PS]算法更好。使用EU-152源允许使用带有Labr3(CE)探测器的一系列伽马射线能量进行测试的性能。这里的自动控制算法最好。改变采样速度显示在20GS / s的时间分辨率下最小的降解,但在4 GS / S处的分辨率差30-60%。这些结果表明,在20或40gs / s的采样速度下,所获得的时间分辨率接近标志的模拟脉冲处理电子器件。与其他作品相比,使用较慢的采样速度,但垂直分辨率较高,获得了略差的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号