首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear fusion >Tokamak plasma high field side response to an n = 3 magnetic perturbation: a comparison of 3D equilibrium solutions from seven different codes
【24h】

Tokamak plasma high field side response to an n = 3 magnetic perturbation: a comparison of 3D equilibrium solutions from seven different codes

机译:托卡马克等离子体对n = 3磁扰动的高场侧响应:来自七个不同代码的3D平衡解的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In comparing equilibrium solutions for a DⅢ-D shot that is amenable to analysis by both stellarator and tokamak three-dimensional (3D) equilibrium codes, a significant disagreement has been seen between solutions of the VMEC stellarator equilibrium code and solutions of tokamak perturbative 3D equilibrium codes. The source of that disagreement has been investigated, and that investigation has led to new insights into the domain of validity of the different equilibrium calculations, and to a finding that the manner in which localized screening currents at low order rational surfaces are handled can affect global properties of the equilibrium solution. The perturbative treatment has been found to break down at surprisingly small perturbation amplitudes due to overlap of the calculated perturbed flux surfaces, and that treatment is not valid in the pedestal region of the DⅢ-D shot studied. The perturbative treatment is valid, however, further into the interior of the plasma, and flux surface overlap does not account for the disagreement investigated here. Calculated equilibrium solutions for simple model cases and comparison of the 3D equilibrium solutions with those of other codes indicate that the disagreement arises from a difference in handling of localized currents at low order rational surfaces, with such currents being absent in VMEC and present in the perturbative codes. The significant differences in the global equilibrium solutions associated with the presence or absence of very localized screening currents at rational surfaces suggests that it may be possible to extract information about localized currents from appropriate measurements of global equilibrium plasma properties. That would require improved diagnostic capability on the high field side of the tokamak plasma, a region difficult to access with diagnostics.
机译:在比较适用于恒星器和托卡马克三维(3D)平衡代码进行分析的DⅢ-D射击的平衡解时,在VMEC恒星器平衡代码的解决方案与托卡马克摄动3D平衡的解决方案之间存在显着分歧代码。已经对这种分歧的根源进行了调查,并且这种调查导致了对不同均衡计算有效性范围的新见解,并发现了处理低阶有理表面的局部屏蔽电流的方式会影响整体平衡溶液的性质。已经发现,由于计算出的扰动通量表面的重叠,扰动处理在令人惊讶的较小扰动幅度处分解,并且该处理在所研究的DⅢ-D射击的基座区域无效。然而,微扰处理是有效的,但进一步进入等离子体内部,并且通量表面重叠并不能解决此处研究的分歧。对于简单模型情况的计算平衡解以及3D平衡解与其他代码的平衡解表明,不一致之处是由于在低阶有理曲面上对局部电流的处理不同而引起的,VMEC中不存在这种电流,而在扰动中则存在这种电流。代码。与在合理表面上存在或不存在非常局部的筛选电流相关的全局平衡解中的显着差异表明,有可能从全局平衡等离子体特性的适当测量中提取有关局部电流的信息。这将需要在托卡马克等离子体的高场侧上提高诊断能力,该区域难以进行诊断。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear fusion》 |2015年第6期|063026.1-063026.8|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA;

    General Atomics, PO Box 85608, San Diego, CA 92186-5608, USA;

    General Atomics, PO Box 85608, San Diego, CA 92186-5608, USA;

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA;

    New York University, New York, NY, USA;

    General Atomics, PO Box 85608, San Diego, CA 92186-5608, USA;

    General Atomics, PO Box 85608, San Diego, CA 92186-5608, USA;

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA;

    EURATOM/CCFE Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, UK;

    National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA;

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Kyoto, Japan;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    3D equilibrium; magnetic perturbation; ELM;

    机译:3D平衡;磁扰动榆树;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号