首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Energy >Letters to the Editor
【24h】

Letters to the Editor

机译:给编辑的信件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dear Madam In your May /June issue of Nuclear Future, there is an article by Julia Pyke of EDF about Sizewell C. Regrettably there are a number of errors:1.、She says UK has never managed to replicate any nuclear power station from a single stable design.Not so - the Magnox stations were followed by the AGRs, of which 7 still operate, and a sequence ofRRA PWRs.2.、She says that Hinkley Point C has met all its milestones to date.Not so, as original date for operation was 2017, and price £9B- now 2025, and £22.5 B.3.、She exhibits a pie chart for 2020 residential customers bill, showing inter alia supply costs 33and suppliers obligations 7.It seems likely that these two items have been transposed, and distribution figure is questionable, as can be seen from EDF own website.It is indeed correct that we need Nuclear Power - for Security of Supply, for zero carbon, for despatchable power. Regrettably other renewables, such as Wind and Solar, do none of these things, as they are stochastically intermittent and extremely expensive.Sadly she has damaged both her own credibility and that of this journal by these errors, as one questions what else is incorrect.
机译:亲爱的女士,您的五月/六月核开的问题,有一篇关于Siadewell C的Julia Pyke的文章令人遗憾的是有很多错误:1。,她说英国从未设法从中恢复任何核电站单一稳定的设计。没有,磁铁站之后是agrs,其中7个仍然是运作的,以及Rra Pwrs的序列。,她说,Hinkley Point C已经达到了所有里程碑到目前为止.Not如此运营日期是2017年,价格£9B-现在2025英镑和22.5英镑,她展示了2020年住宅客户票据的饼图,展示AMIA供应费33和供应商义务7.似乎这两个项目似乎很可能已经转置,分配数字是值得怀疑的,从EDF自己的网站可以看出,我们确实是正确的,我们需要核电 - 用于供应的安全性,对于零碳,可用于算法。令人遗憾的是其他可再生能源,如风和太阳能,没有这些事情,因为它们是随机间歇性的,而且它们非常昂贵。她已经损害了她自己的信誉和这些杂志的这些错误,就像其他错误一样的问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear Energy》 |2020年第4期|13-13|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号