首页> 外文期刊>Newsweek >The Tax on Free Speech
【24h】

The Tax on Free Speech

机译:自由讲话的税收

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To anyone comcerned about free speech, the failure of the Supreme Court to rule on a case brought by Nike Inc. is more than disappointing. It's a disaster. Just about the last people you'd want to put in charge of the First Amendment are trial lawyers, whose business is suing large companies on any available pretext. The latest pretext imperils free speech, but the Supreme Court―out of intellectual laziness or reckless indifference―has unwisely given trial lawyers the power to curb and to tax free speech. Bad show. Nike is (as almost everyone knows) a huge seller of sports shoes and gear. Its most recent annual sales and profits total $10.6 billion and $474 million, respectively. Although Nike employs only 22,000 workers directly, it has contractors that make its products and have 600,000 workers in 910 factories in 51 countries. They're concentrated in China, Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand, where roughly 90 percent of Nike shoes are manufactured.
机译:对于任何关于自由言论的人,最高法院的失败就是耐克公司带来的案件。不仅仅是令人失望。这是一场灾难。对于您想要负责第一次修正案的最后一名审判律师,其业务在任何可用的借口上起诉大公司。最新的借口威胁自由言论,但最高法院的知识懒惰或鲁莽的漠不关心 - 不明智地给予审判律师遏制的权力和税收言论。糟糕的表演。耐克(正如几乎所有人都知道)运动鞋和装备的巨大卖家。其最近的年度销售和利润分别为106亿美元和4.74亿美元。虽然耐克直接雇用了22,000名工人,但它拥有承包商,使其产品成为其产品,并在51个国家的910家工厂中拥有60万名工人。他们集中在中国,印度尼西亚,越南和泰国,其中大约90%的耐克鞋制造。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Newsweek》 |2003年第2期|p.41|共1页
  • 作者

    Robert J. Samuelson;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 22:42:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号