首页> 外文学位 >Cultural conflicts and problems of free speech: Comparative free speech in the United States and Japan as exemplified by limits on sexual expression.
【24h】

Cultural conflicts and problems of free speech: Comparative free speech in the United States and Japan as exemplified by limits on sexual expression.

机译:文化冲突和言论自由的问题:美国和日本的比较言论自由,以性表达的限制为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this research, obscenity court decisions from United States and Japan are examined comparatively to present what kinds of culturally unique values and beliefs found in each society's historical experiences and cultural practices affect the way in which contemporary courts decide cases involving sexual expression. Although both nations share similar interests in pursuing freedom of speech guaranteed in their constitutions, their courts' rulings on free speech cases are uniquely different. Each country's cultural norms, values and beliefs justify the restriction of speech, and laws can become an ideological apparatus. Court decisions may help society and individuals construct the idea about what kinds of speech should or should not be accepted.While free speech rights may be considered an essential element for democratic governance, the suppression of sexual expression is a considerably complex problem in democratic societies. The discussion of sexuality may still be labeled as an issue to be condemned as a public debate, while with the technological innovation, the adult entertainment industries in the United States and Japan grew significantly in the last thirty years. While the public discussion about sex can no longer be avoided because of its effects on our everyday life practices regarding political, economic, medical, technological and religious activities, the legal systems of both nations are not willing to deregulate sexual expression any further because of the universal beliefs in the harm of sexual expression to society's welfare.This research reveals that both nations apply moral-based theories to restrict sexual expression. In the United States, the Puritan influence on morality regarding sex is still significant despite the secularization of society and strong awareness of individual rights to speak freely. Japanese courts rule on obscenity decisions through values derived from traditional ideologies, such as Bushido and Kokutai, which have been maintained and reaffirmed continuously since the Meiji period. The conservative rulings in obscenity cases by the American and Japanese courts are aimed to preserve sexual morality as an important constituent of nationalistic identity as "civilized" societies. The identity of the "civilized" becomes an eminent aspect for these nations to develop political and economic power over not only domestic situations but also global affairs.
机译:在这项研究中,对来自美国和日本的ob亵法庭的判决进行了比较研究,以揭示每个社会的历史经验和文化习俗中发现的哪些文化上独特的价值观和信念会影响当代法院对涉及性表达的案件进行判决的方式。尽管两国在追求其宪法​​所保障的言论自由方面有着相同的利益,但两国法院对言论自由案件的裁定却有着独特的不同。每个国家的文化规范,价值观和信仰证明限制言论是正当的,法律可以成为意识形态的工具。法院的判决可能会帮助社会和个人构建关于应该接受或不应该接受哪种言论的想法。尽管言论自由权被认为是民主施政的基本要素,但抑制性表达在民主社会中是一个相当复杂的问题。关于性问题的讨论可能仍然被标记为一个公开辩论的问题,而随着技术的创新,美国和日本的成人娱乐产业在过去的30年中显着增长。虽然由于对性的影响会影响我们在政治,经济,医疗,技术和宗教活动等日常生活中的行为,所以不再可以避免对性的公开讨论,但两国的法律体系都不愿进一步放松对性表达的管制。研究表明,两国都运用基于道德的理论来限制性表达。在美国,尽管社会世俗化并且对个人言论自由的意识很强,但清教徒对性道德的影响仍然很大。自明治以来,日本法院通过武士道和国立等传统意识形态衍生的价值观裁定淫秽判决。美国和日本法院对淫秽案件的保守裁定旨在维护性道德,将其作为“文明”社会的民族主义身份的重要组成部分。 “文明”的身份成为这些国家不仅在国内局势而且在全球事务上发展政治和经济实力的重要方面。

著录项

  • 作者

    Obata, Yuri.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado at Boulder.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado at Boulder.;
  • 学科 American Studies.Mass Communications.Anthropology Cultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 359 p.
  • 总页数 359
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号