首页> 外文期刊>New Space >Human Spaceflight Mishap Investigations: Enabling a Better Model for Future NASA and Commercial Investigations
【24h】

Human Spaceflight Mishap Investigations: Enabling a Better Model for Future NASA and Commercial Investigations

机译:载人航天事故调查:为未来的NASA和商业调查提供更好的模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

iThis article examines major human spaceflight (HSF) mishap investigations and the underlying authorities that establish the legal landscape for these investigations. In the next few years, NASA plans to fly 3 new space vehicles that will carry crew. In addition, commercial companies are preparing to send humans on orbital and suborbital flights. Although the mishaps of Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia have been studied extensively, applying those lessons to new investigations will be critical to HSF development. Furthermore, the expanding roles of investigative authorities such as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in commercial spaceflight mishaps will add to the complexity. For example, the NTSB was the sole investigation authority for Scaled Composites' SpaceShipTwo mishap in 2014. In the past, NASA conducted mishap investigations based on its inherent authority in the Space Act. However, the 2005 NASA Authorization Act requires a Presidential Commission to investigate HSF mishaps involving loss of crew or loss of vehicle. When future crewed flights to the International Space Station (ISS) have an FAA license, NTSB may conduct the investigation. In contrast, mishaps involving ISS activities may involve agreements between international partners. The legal structure for the ISS specifically provides for cooperation during mishap investigations. When a European Space Agency astronaut had a close call on ISS in 2013, NASA's investigation included observers from international partners. To reconcile these overlapping authorities, different agreements, and to develop a better model for future investigations, we may draw from the experience of civil space investigations and military mishap investigation processes. In military aviation accidents, a safety investigation determines the root cause and a legal investigation focuses on responsibility for mishaps. A different set of legal authorities were involved in more recent FAA-licensed activities, including Orbital's mishap in October 2014 and the SpaceX mishap in June 2015. FAA, NTSB, NASA, and the commercial provider were involved in these mishaps. Having a clear understanding of the legal authorities involved and the role of these investigations will be key in future spaceflight development. This understanding, in turn, will help both NASA and the international commercial space community to develop the most effective investigation model to support the growth of HSF.
机译:本文研究了主要的人类航天事故(HSF)事故调查以及为这些调查确定法律前景的基本当局。在接下来的几年中,美国宇航局计划飞行3架新的载人航天飞机。此外,商业公司正准备将人类送入轨道和亚轨道飞行。尽管已经对Apollo 1,挑战者和哥伦比亚的不幸事件进行了广泛的研究,但将这些经验教训应用于新的调查对于HSF的发展至关重要。此外,联邦航空局(FAA)和国家运输安全委员会(NTSB)等调查机构在商业航天事故中的作用不断扩大,将增加这种复杂性。例如,NTSB是2014年Scaled Composites的SpaceShipTwo事故的唯一调查机构。过去,NASA根据其在《太空法》中的固有权限进行了事故调查。但是,《 2005年NASA授权法》要求总统委员会调查涉及人员流失或车辆丢失的HSF事故。当未来飞往国际空间站(ISS)的人员飞行获得FAA许可证时,NTSB可以进行调查。相反,涉及国际空间站活动的不幸事件可能涉及国际伙伴之间的协议。国际空间站的法律结构专门规定了事故调查期间的合作。当欧洲航天局的宇航员在2013年对国际空间站进行了密切采访时,美国宇航局的调查包括来自国际合作伙伴的观察员。为了调和这些重叠的权力机构,不同的协议,并为将来的调查开发更好的模型,我们可以借鉴民用空间调查和军事事故调查过程的经验。在军事航空事故中,安全调查确定了根本原因,而法律调查则侧重于事故责任。一组不同的法律机构参与了最近获得FAA许可的活动,包括2014年10月的Orbital事故和2015年6月的SpaceX事故。FAA,NTSB,NASA和商业提供商参与了这些事故。清楚了解所涉及的法律机构以及这些调查的作用将是未来航天发展的关键。反过来,这种理解将帮助NASA和国际商业太空界开发最有效的调查模型,以支持HSF的增长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号