首页> 外文期刊>New scientist >The nuclear option
【24h】

The nuclear option

机译:核选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Security worries, political shifts in Scotland, spending cuts and the looming deadline for renewal mean the UK's nuclear weapons are under welcome new scrutiny. Those who want to update the Trident system - four submarines based in Scotland carrying nuclear missiles - often focus on the jobs it sustains, keeping the UK "safe" and its support for science and engineering. Opponents talk about the vast casualties and nuclear winter if such weapons were used and the £100 billion cost. What's clear is that the UK cannot afford the most expensive conventional military capabilities, such as aircraft carriers and an army that can support several big invasions, and pay for new nuclear warheads and submarines. The Trident fleet will be retired in the late 2020s, but the time needed to build replacements means renewal decisions are just months away. So now is the time to show leadership and commit to decommissioning nuclear weapons. We can't uninvent them but we can follow the lead of other nuclear capable nations that have chosen not to have them.
机译:安全方面的担忧,苏格兰的政治转变,削减支出以及更新的迫在眉睫的最后期限,意味着英国的核武器正在受到新的严格审查。那些想要更新“三叉戟”系统的人-驻扎在苏格兰的四艘潜艇携带核导弹-经常专注于它所维持的工作,以保持英国的“安全”及其对科学和工程的支持。反对者谈论如果使用此类武器会造成巨大的人员伤亡和核冬天,并花费1000亿英镑。显而易见的是,英国负担不起最昂贵的常规军事能力,例如航空母舰和可以支持几起大规模入侵并支付新核弹头和潜艇费用的军队。三叉戟舰队将在2020年代末期退役,但是建造替换飞机所需的时间意味着更新决定仅数月之遥。因此,现在是展示领导能力并致力于退役核武器的时候了。我们不能发明它们,但我们可以效仿其他选择不拥有它们的有核能力的国家。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New scientist》 |2015年第3024期|24-25|共2页
  • 作者

    Philip Webber;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号