...
首页> 外文期刊>New Political Economy >Region, Regionness and Regionalism in Latin America: Towards a New Synthesis
【24h】

Region, Regionness and Regionalism in Latin America: Towards a New Synthesis

机译:拉丁美洲的地区,地区性和地区主义:迈向新的综合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Latin American regional governance today represents a conglomerate of commercial, political and trans-societal welfarist integration projects. In this overlapping and sometimes conflicting scenario what Latin Americanness should mean, and how integration projects should respond to current challenges of global political economy are being redefined. The focus of the paper is twofold: to better understand current regional transformations and to discuss what new developments mean for how we theorise non-European regionalism. Looking at the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas and the Union of South American Nations we ask: How are we to understand regional agreements that are grounded in different systems of rules, alternative ideas and motivations that contest ‘open regionalism’? We argue that Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) and Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas (ALBA) represent different pathways to regional building, creating foundations for post-hegemonic and post-trade regional governance. We thus challenge New Regionalist approaches that assume regionalism as taking place within and modelled by neoliberal economics, establishing the debate around ‘old’ vs. ‘new’ regionalism. As these categories are limited in grasping the full meaning and implications of post-hegemonic regional orders, we discuss UNASUR and ALBA as ‘arenas for action’ to understand divergent practices, outcomes and types of regionness emerging in alternative regional spaces in South America.View full textDownload full textKeywordsregionness, New Regionalist approach, post-hegemonic regional governance, welfarist regionalism, ALBA, UNASURRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.603827
机译:今天的拉丁美洲区域治理是商业,政治和跨社会福利融合项目的联合体。在这种重叠有时冲突的情况下,拉丁美洲的含义以及一体化项目应如何应对全球政治经济的当前挑战正在重新定义。本文的重点是两方面的:更好地了解当前的地区转型,并讨论新发展对我们如何理论化非欧洲地区主义的意义。回顾美洲玻利瓦尔联盟和南美国家联盟,我们要问:我们如何理解以不同的规则体系,替代思想和动机为基础的,与“开放的区域主义”相抗衡的区域协议?我们认为,南美国家联盟(UNASUR)和美洲玻利​​瓦尔联盟(ALBA)代表了区域建设的不同途径,为霸权主义和贸易后的区域治理奠定了基础。因此,我们挑战了新的区域主义方法,这些方法假定区域主义是在新自由主义经济学内部发生并以新自由主义经济学为模型的,围绕“旧”与“新”区域主义展开了辩论。由于这些类别在掌握霸权后区域秩序的全部含义和含义方面受到限制,因此我们将UNASUR和ALBA讨论为“行动领域”,以了解在南方其他区域空间中出现的不同做法,结果和区域类型America.View全文下载全文关键字区域性,新区域主义方法,霸权后的区域治理,福利主义区域主义,ALBA,UNASUR相关的var addthis_config = { linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,发布ID:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.603827

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号