首页> 外文期刊>New library world >Characteristics of asynchronous online discussions in a graduate course: an exploratory study
【24h】

Characteristics of asynchronous online discussions in a graduate course: an exploratory study

机译:研究生课程中异步在线讨论的特征:探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to investigate the following questions: What are the types of discussion prompts in a fully online graduate course? What are the key characteristics of students' discussion initial posts and replies in a fully online graduate course? In what ways, if any, do discussion prompts influence the types of initial posts and replies in discussion threads? Design/methodology/approach - This study adopted a qualitative approach to explore the dynamics of students' knowledge construction through using asynchronous discussion boards. A total of 20 discussion prompts and 115 discussion threads from nine archival discussion boards in a fully online library science course were collected and analyzed. Findings - The findings identified open-ended, explanatory and reflective prompts in discussion boards. Students engaged in simply stating, paraphrasing, elaborating, extending, reflecting, socializing and sharing emotions in discussion posts. These findings highlighted the interconnectedness of reflection and socio-emotional interactions in a community of inquiry and pointed out their important roles to support richer and deeper online discussions. The study further observed linkages between the types of discussion prompts and the types of discussion posts. Originality/value - This study addressed an urgent need to understand the use of online discussion boards in an emergency remote teaching condition in a pandemic. The findings of this study offered educators insights into evidence-based design recommendations for prompts to support students' knowledge construction and deep learning through using discussion boards.
机译:目的 - 本文旨在调查以下问题:在在线研究生课程中讨论会提示的类型是什么?学生讨论初始职位的主要特征是什么以及在全网上研究生课程中的答复?在哪些方面,如果有的话,讨论会提示影响初始帖子的类型并在讨论线程中回复?设计/方法/方法 - 本研究采用了一种定性方法来探讨学生知识建设的动态,通过使用异步讨论板。收集和分析了共有20个讨论提示和来自九个档案讨论委员会的115个讨论线程,并分析并分析。调查结果 - 调查结果确定了讨论板中的开放式,解释性和反思性提示。学生在讨论岗位中从事简单地说明,释放,阐述,伸展,反思,社交和分享情绪。这些调查结果强调了对探究社区中的反思和社会情感互动的互连,并指出了支持更丰富和更深入的在线讨论的重要作用。该研究进一步观察了讨论提示类型与讨论职位类型之间的联系。原创性/值 - 本研究涉及迫切需要了解在大流行中紧急远程教学条件下的在线讨论委员会的使用。本研究的调查结果为教育工作者提供了讨论的设计建议,以提示通过使用讨论委员会支持学生的知识建设和深入学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号