首页> 外文期刊>New Economy >Paradigm lost, paradigm gained?
【24h】

Paradigm lost, paradigm gained?

机译:范式迷失了,范式获得了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Progressives cannot cling to the institutional fragments of the 20th century to shore themselves against future ruin. Deep structural changes in capitalism, culture and society are opening up new possibilities and challenges that a political economy forged in the last century can only partly address. What is required is not just a nostalgic project of recreation, but creation itself - the creation of new institutions and forms of organisation that can better disperse and democratise power and reward in the economy. I have suggested that there are immediate possibilities for building coalitions focussed on reforming vocational and skills training, industrial relations and corporate governance which would shift the economy in a democratising direction. More than that, though, it will require new thinking that is less fixated on old debates. Perhaps above all, it will require a politics and a political economy that is alive to the democratising potential of the present moment.
机译:进步主义者不能紧紧抓住20世纪的体制碎片来支撑自己免受未来的破坏。资本主义,文化和社会的深刻结构变化正在开辟新的可能性和挑战,而上个世纪形成的政治经济只能部分解决这些挑战。所需要的不仅是怀旧的娱乐项目,还包括创造本身-创建新的机构和组织形式,可以更好地分散经济中的权力和报酬并使之民主化。我已经提出,建立联盟的眼前可能是侧重于改革职业和技能培训,劳资关系和公司治理的联盟,这将使经济朝着民主化的方向发展。但是,不仅如此,它还需要新思想,而新思想则很少被旧辩论所关注。也许最重要的是,这将需要一种活在当下民主化潜力中的政治和政治经济。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New Economy》 |2014年第3期|222-233|共12页
  • 作者

    Mathew Lawrence;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:26:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号