首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >Dynamic cerebral autoregulation: should intracranial pressure be taken into account?
【24h】

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation: should intracranial pressure be taken into account?

机译:动态脑自动调节:应考虑颅内压吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Although the inclusion of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is a standard feature in static testing of autoregulation after head injury, controversy surrounds the use of CPP versus arterial blood pressure (ABP) in dynamic tests. The aim of our project was to assess the discrepancies between methods of dynamic autoregulation testing based on CPP or ABP, and study possible differences in their prognostic value.
机译:背景。尽管在颅脑损伤后自动调节的静态测试中包括了脑灌注压力(CPP)的标准功能,但在动态测试中围绕CPP与动脉血压(ABP)的使用存在争议。我们项目的目的是评估基于CPP或ABP的动态自动调节测试方法之间的差异,并研究其预后价值的可能差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号