首页> 外文期刊>Neuro-Oncology >Differentiating Treatment-Induced Necrosis From Recurrent/Progressive Brain Tumor Using Nonmodel-Based Semiquantitative Indices Derived From Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Mr Perfusion
【24h】

Differentiating Treatment-Induced Necrosis From Recurrent/Progressive Brain Tumor Using Nonmodel-Based Semiquantitative Indices Derived From Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Mr Perfusion

机译:使用基于动态对比增强的T1加权先生灌注的基于非模型的半定量指标,将治疗性坏死与复发/进行性脑肿瘤区分开来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Differentiating treatment-induced necrosis (TIN) from recurrent/progressive tumor (RPT) in brain tumor patients using conventional morphologic imaging features is a very challenging task. Functional imaging techniques also offer moderate success due to the complexity of the tissue microenvironment and the inherent limitation of the various modalities and techniques. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the utility of nonmodel-based semiquantitative indices derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR perfusion (DCET1MRP) in differentiating TIN from RPT. Twenty-nine patients with previously treated brain tumors who showed recurrent or progressive enhancing lesion on follow-up MRI underwent DCET1MRP. Another 8 patients with treatment-naive high-grade gliomas who also underwent DCET1MRP were included as the control group. Semiquantitative indices derived from DCET1MRP included maximum slope of enhancement in initial vascular phase (MSIVP), normalized MSIVP (nMSIVP), normalized slope of delayed equilibrium phase (nSDEP), and initial area under the time-intensity curve (IAUC) at 60 and 120 s (IAUC_60 and IAUC_120) obtained from the enhancement curve. There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P<.01), with theRPT group showing higher MSIVP (15.78 vs 8.06), nMSIVP (0.046 vs 0.028), nIAUC60 (33.07 vs 6.44), and nIAUC_120 (80.14 vs 65.55) compared with the TIN group. nSDEP was significantly lower in the RPT group (7.20 x 10~(-5) vs 15.35 x 10~(-5) compared with the TIN group. Analysis of the receiver-operating-characteristic curve showed nMSIVP to be the best single predictor of RPT, with very high (95 %) sensitivity and high (78%) specificity. Thus, nonmodel-based semi-quantitative indices derived from DCET1MRP that are relatively easy to derive and do not require a complex model-based approach may aid in differentiating RPT from TIN and can be used as robust noninvasive imaging biomarkers.
机译:使用常规形态学影像学特征区分脑肿瘤患者的治疗性坏死(TIN)与复发/进展性肿瘤(RPT)是一项非常艰巨的任务。由于组织微环境的复杂性以及各种方式和技术的固有局限性,功能成像技术也取得了一定的成功。这项回顾性研究的目的是评估基于动态非增强T1加权MR灌注(DCET1MRP)的基于非模型的半定量指标在区分TIN与RPT方面的实用性。 29名先前接受过脑肿瘤治疗的患者在随访MRI上显示出复发性或进行性病变,接受DCET1MRP治疗。另有8例未经治疗的高级神经胶质瘤患者也接受DCET1MRP治疗,作为对照组。从DCET1MRP得出的半定量指标包括初始血管阶段(MSIVP)增强的最大斜率,标准化MSIVP(nMSIVP),延迟平衡阶段(nSDEP)的标准化斜率以及时间强度曲线下的初始面积(IAUC)在60和120从增强曲线获得的s(IAUC_60和IAUC_120)。两组之间有统计学差异(P <.01),RPT组显示更高的MSIVP(15.78 vs 8.06),nMSIVP(0.046 vs 0.028),nIAUC60(33.07 vs 6.44)和nIAUC_120(80.14 vs 65.55)与TIN组相比。与TIN组相比,RPT组的nSDEP显着降低(7.20 x 10〜(-5)对15.35 x 10〜(-5),接收器工作特征曲线的分析表明nMSIVP是最佳的单项预测指标RPT具有很高的灵敏度(95%)和很高的特异性(78%),因​​此,从DCET1MRP导出的基于非模型的半定量指标相对容易得出,不需要复杂的基于模型的方法,可能会有助于区分来自TIN的RPT,可用作稳健的非侵入性成像生物标志物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号