首页> 外文期刊>Nature >Against the grain
【24h】

Against the grain

机译:反对谷物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Last June, the China Daily―the English-language mouthpiece of the country's ruling Communist Party―published an article by Greenpeace, describing the alleged ecological risks posed by transgenic crops. It wasn't quite as though Amnesty International had been asked to write a piece on China's treatment of its political dissidents, but for those who are familiar with Beijing's official line on transgenic agriculture, it still marked a dramatic turnaround. Since the mid-1980s, the Chinese government has ploughed hundreds of millions of dollars into developing the technology, and in the late 1990s it swiftly authorized the commercialization of a handful of transgenic crops. At that time, Chinese agriculture seemed to be on the highway to a genetically modified future. Indeed, at the lab bench, that is still the case: universities and government labs are bursting with ideas, talent and investment. "Plant science is a major activity, because it is so important to China," says Jiayang Li, director of the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology in Beijing.
机译:去年六月,执政的共产党的英语喉舌《中国日报》发表了绿色和平组织的一篇文章,描述了转基因作物构成的所谓生态风险。似乎并没有要求国际特赦组织写一篇关于中国对待其政治异见人士的文章,但是对于那些熟悉北京官方转基因农业路线的人来说,它仍然标志着一个戏剧性的转变。自1980年代中期以来,中国政府投入了数亿美元来开发这项技术,并在1990年代后期迅速批准了几种转基因作物的商业化。当时,中国农业似乎正处于转基因未来的高速公路上。确实,在实验室工作台上,情况仍然如此:大学和政府实验室都充满着想法,人才和投资。中国科学院遗传与发育生物学研究所所长李嘉阳说:“植物科学是一项重大活动,因为它对中国至关重要。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nature》 |2003年第6928期|p.111-112|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:57:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号