On the heels of last year's anniversary celebrations of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species and C. P. Snow's 'Two Cultures' essay, an interdisciplinary view of evolutionary theory by philosopher Jerry Fodor and cognitive scientist Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini might be anticipated with interest. Unfortunately, What Darwin Got Wrong fails to bridge these two cultures.rnBy misusing philosophical distinctions and misinterpreting the literature on natural selection, Fodor and Piattelli-Palmarini make a mess of what could have been an important contribution. The authors are correct in two of their assessments. Namely that: mainstream rnevolutionary biology has become complacent with the nearly 70-year-old Modern Synthesis, which reconciled the original theory of natural selection with Mendelian and population genetics; and that the field needs to extend the conceptual arsenal of evolutionary theory. But in claiming that there are fundamental flaws in an edifice that has withstood a century and a half of critical examination, Fodor and Piattelli-Palmarini err horribly.
展开▼
机译:在去年周年纪念查尔斯·达尔文(Charles Darwin)的《物种起源》(On the Species of Species)和C. P. Snow(C. P. Snow)的“两种文化”论文之后,哲学家杰里·福多(Jerry Fodor)和认知科学家Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini对进化论的跨学科观点可能会引起人们的兴趣。不幸的是,达尔文的错误导致了这两种文化之间的桥梁。作者的两项评估是正确的。即:主流的进化论生物学已经与已有近70年历史的《现代综合》相得益彰,《现代综合》将自然选择的原始理论与孟德尔和人口遗传学相吻合;并且该领域需要扩展进化理论的概念库。但是,在声称经过一个半世纪的严格审查的建筑物中存在根本缺陷之后,福多(Fodor)和皮亚特利(Piattelli-Palmarini)犯下了可怕的错误。
展开▼