首页> 外文期刊>Nature >Divided opinions
【24h】

Divided opinions

机译:意见分歧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Researchers around the world love their work, but tight funding is eroding their spirits, according to this year's Nature Careers salary survey. Although nearly two-thirds of the survey's 7, 216 respondents across the world report being satisfied or very satisfied with their job, nearly half say that they think that the morale in their lab or department is slipping, and two-thirds of those who responded to the question do not believe that the funding environment is improving (see 'Money and morale'). The survey asked participants not only about morale in their lab or department but also about the level and accessibility of science funding. It also asked people where their funding came from, such as government grants or contracts, private grants, royalties or venture-capital funds. Participants could also rate how 15 factors - including salary, benefits, financial resources, interest in their work and availability of funding - affect their job satisfaction. And they were asked to rate their level of job satisfaction and indicate whether that had changed in the past year.
机译:根据今年的《自然职业》(Nature Careers)薪水调查,全世界的研究人员都热爱他们的工作,但是紧缺的资金正在侵蚀他们的精神。尽管在调查的7位受访者中,有近三分之二的人表示对工作感到满意或非常满意,但近一半的人说,他们认为实验室或部门的士气正在下降,而三分之二的人对此表示满意。对于这个问题,不要相信筹资环境正在改善(请参阅“金钱和士气”)。该调查不仅询问参与者他们实验室或部门的士气,而且询问有关科学经费的水平和可及性。它还询问人们其资金来自何处,例如政府补助或合同,私人补助,特许权使用费或风险投资基金。参与者还可以评估15个因素(包括薪水,福利,财务资源,对工作的兴趣以及资金的可获得性)如何影响他们的工作满意度。他们被要求对他们的工作满意度进行评分,并指出过去一年是否有所改变。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nature》 |2014年第7517期|267-268|共2页
  • 作者

    PAUL SMAGLIK;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:53:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号