首页> 外文期刊>Natur und Landschaft >Naturschutz im geteilten Deutschland Deutsch-deutsche Naturschutzkontakte 1945-1969
【24h】

Naturschutz im geteilten Deutschland Deutsch-deutsche Naturschutzkontakte 1945-1969

机译:分裂的德国的自然保护德国与德国的自然保护联系1945-1969

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The impacts of the cold war in the period between 1945 and 1969 increasingly confined the opportunities for cooperation between conservationists in East and West Germany. As was to be expected the year 1961 constituted a great divide, especially on the level of the nature conservation authorities: Meeting personally became more difficult, joint conferences virtually impossible. From now on the face-to-face exchange of ideas and information was only possible in the West-East direction. The specific West-German political instrument of the cold war since 1955, the Hallstein Doctrine, turned out to be the main obstacle to effective and continuous cooperation, at least for the official nature conservation of the two German states. Beyond that this foreign policy doctrine produced some contradictory effects. It limited the range of action of the East German ILN extremely, on the international level as well as in German-German relations. Meanwhile for the West German BANL, in times when the mere existence of this institution was frequently questioned, the doctrine supplied a political raison d'etre: The activities of the nature conservation authorities in the German Democratic Republic contributed to the maintenance of an independent BANL. Below this institutional level various relations continued to exist. Many conservationists, associations and federations as well as scientific and naturalhistory societies endeavoured to maintain channels for the exchange of information and publications, even if this required conspiratorial activities.
机译:1945年至1969年这段时期的冷战冲击日益限制了东西德保护主义者之间合作的机会。可以预见的是,1961年是一个巨大的鸿沟,尤其是在自然保护当局的层面上:个人开会变得更加困难,联合会议实际上是不可能的。从现在开始,只有在东西方向上才能进行面对面的思想和信息交流。自1955年以来,冷战的特定西德政治手段霍尔斯坦主义被证明是有效和持续合作的主要障碍,至少对于德国两个国家的官方自然保护而言。除了这种外交政策学说之外,还产生了一些矛盾的影响。它极大地限制了东德ILN在国际上以及在德德关系中的行动范围。同时,对于西德BANL,在经常质疑该机构仅仅存在的时候,该学说提供了政治理由:德意志民主共和国自然保护当局的活动有助于维持独立的BANL 。在这种体制水平之下,各种关系继续存在。许多保护主义者,协会和联合会以及科学和自然历史学会都努力维持交流信息和出版物的渠道,即使这需要阴谋活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号