首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop 1/2 December 2015 Bonn BMUB (Bundesministerium für Umwelt Naturschutz Bau und Reaktorsicherheit; Federal Ministry for the Environment Nature Conservation Building and Nuclear Safety)
【2h】

Current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop 1/2 December 2015 Bonn BMUB (Bundesministerium für Umwelt Naturschutz Bau und Reaktorsicherheit; Federal Ministry for the Environment Nature Conservation Building and Nuclear Safety)

机译:当前关于risk风险的知识:对实际辐射防护的意义? don气研讨会2015年12月1/2日波恩BMUB(联邦环境自然保护建筑和核安全部;联邦环境自然保护建筑和核安全部)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ICRP suggested a strategy based on the distinction between a protection approach for dwellings and one for workplaces in the previous recommendations on radon. Now, the Commission recommends an integrated approach for the protection against radon exposure in all buildings irrespective of their purpose and the status of their occupants. The strategy of protection in buildings, implemented through a national action plan, is based on the application of the optimisation principle below a derived reference level in concentration (maximum 300 Bq m−3). A problem, however, arises that due to new epidemiological findings and application of dosimetric models, ICRP 115 (Ann ICRP 40, ) presents nominal probability coefficients for radon exposure that are approximately by a factor of 2 larger than in the former recommendations of ICRP 65 (Ann ICRP 23, ). On the basis of the so-called epidemiological approach and the dosimetric approach, the doubling of risk per unit exposure is represented by a doubling of the dose coefficients, while the risk coefficient of ICRP 103 () remains unchanged. Thus, an identical given radon exposure situation with the new dose coefficients would result in a doubling of dose compared with the former values. This is of serious conceptual implications. A possible solution of this problem was presented during the workshop.
机译:ICRP在先前关于ra的建议中提出了一种基于住宅保护方法和工作场所保护方法之间区别的策略。现在,委员会建议采取综合措施,防止所有建筑物中的purpose暴露,无论其目的和居住者的身份如何。通过一项国家行动计划实施的建筑物保护策略是基于优化原则在浓度推导的参考水平以下(最大300 Bq m -3 )的应用。但是,由于新的流行病学发现和剂量学模型的应用,出现了一个问题,即ICRP 115(Ann ICRP 40,)提出的exposure暴露的名义概率系数比ICRP 65以前的建议大了大约2倍。 (Ann ICRP 23,)。在所谓的流行病学方法和剂量学方法的基础上,单位暴露风险增加一倍是剂量系数增加一倍,而ICRP 103()的风险系数保持不变。因此,与新的剂量系数相同的给定的ra暴露情况将导致剂量比以前的值增加一倍。这具有严重的概念含义。在研讨会期间,提出了对此问题的可能解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号