首页> 外文期刊>Natural Resources Journal >Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Isolated Waters, Migratory Birds, Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation
【24h】

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Isolated Waters, Migratory Birds, Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation

机译:北库克郡固体废物局诉美国陆军工程兵团:孤立水域,候鸟,法定和宪法解释

获取原文
           

摘要

The U.S. Supreme Court, through its statutory and constitutional interpretations, has revived federalism to curtail federal authority. In the Solid Waste case, the Court, relying primarily on the text of the Clean Water Act, determined that the federal government lacked jurisdiction over isolated waters that serve as migratory bird habitat. The Court's decision was inconsistent with text, intent, and purposes of the statute. The Court reinforced its statutory interpretation by declaring that the migratory bird rule probably exceeded federal commerce clause authority. The Court's speculation was dubious under the framework of United States v. Lopez. The Court's conclusions are not a positive sign for the future of environmental law.
机译:美国最高法院通过其法定和宪法解释,恢复了联邦制,以减少联邦权力。在“固体废物”案中,法院主要依据《清洁水法》的案文裁定,联邦政府对作为候鸟栖息地的偏远水域缺乏管辖权。法院的裁决与规约的文字,意图和目的不一致。法院宣布候鸟规则可能超出联邦商业条款授权,从而加强了其法定解释。在美国诉洛佩兹案的框架下,法院的猜测是可疑的。法院的结论对环境法的未来并不是一个积极的信号。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号