首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards >Stakeholders’ perception in identification of river bank erosion hazard: a case study
【24h】

Stakeholders’ perception in identification of river bank erosion hazard: a case study

机译:利益相关者在识别河岸侵蚀危害中的看法:一个案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hazards due to riverbank erosion, despite being considered usually as a natural phenomenon, have become a critical problem in recent times as introduction of new technology and one-sided engineering-based solution approach to combat natural hazards without taking into account of opinions of all categories of stakeholders, particularly of the hazard victims and policy makers, has aggravated the problem in many cases. The riverbank erosion hazard aggravated as a direct consequence of construction of Farakka Barrage on its upstream and downstream on the river Ganga has seriously affected the lifestyles of the people in the districts of Malda and Murshidabad in the state of West Bengal in India. In this paper, an attempt has been made to study the perceptions of different groups of stakeholders, particularly hazard victims and authority responsible for monetary investment, about causes of riverbank erosion and possible preventive and remedial measures required to solve such a complex and multi-dimensional problem. A questionnaire-based household survey has been conducted on a number of important issues of the problem among the directly affected hazard victims at a highly erosion-prone area in the Malda district. Different perceptions and their impacts on selection and implementation of anti-erosion measures are critically studied. Analysis of data as obtained from the representative sample of erosion victims as well as the secondary sources of data clearly indicates that the hazard victims are to face bad effects because of existence of perception gap and that a holistic approach considering the perception of erosion victims needs to be undertaken for a permanent solution of the problem.
机译:尽管通常被认为是自然现象,但由于河岸侵蚀造成的危害已成为近来的关键问题,因为引入了新技术和基于工程的单方面解决方案来与自然灾害作斗争而不考虑所有类别的意见在许多情况下,利益相关者的利益,尤其是危害受害者和政策制定者的利益,加剧了这一问题。法拉卡(Farakka)拦河坝在甘加河上游和下游建造的直接后果是加剧了河岸侵蚀的危害,严重影响了印度西孟加拉邦马尔达(Malda)和穆尔西达巴德(Murshidabad)地区人们的生活方式。本文试图研究不同利益相关者群体的看法,尤其是危害受害者和负责货币投资的权威,关于河岸侵蚀的成因以及解决这种复杂和多维问题所需的可能的预防和补救措施的看法。问题。在马尔达(Malda)高度易发生侵蚀的地区,对直接受灾的受害人中的一些重要问题进行了基于问卷的家庭调查。对不同的观念及其对选择和实施抗腐蚀措施的影响进行了严格的研究。从侵蚀受害者的代表性样本中获得的数据分析以及数据的第二来源清楚地表明,由于存在感知鸿沟,危害受害者将面临不利影响,而考虑侵蚀受害者感知的整体方法需要采取永久解决问题的措施。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Natural Hazards》 |2011年第3期|p.905-928|共24页
  • 作者

    Bela Das;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号