【24h】

In the Courts

机译:在法院

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Hawai'i Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui, No. 12-00198, (D. Haw. May 30, 2014). A district court held that a Hawaiian county illegally discharged wastewater into the ocean through groundwater injection wells in violation of the CWA. An environmental group sued the county, seeking to compel it to apply for and comply with the terms of an NPDES permit, and to pay civil penalties for its allegedly unlawful discharges. The county has since applied for an NPDES permit. It therefore argued the case should be dismissed or stayed pending the permit application process. But an application for an NPDES permit, without more, cannot justify a dismissal, much less a potentially lengthy or indefinite stay. Otherwise, a polluting entity would be able to spend years in litigation prior to even applying for an NPDES permit, then seek to stay proceedings for several more years during the pendency of a belatedly submitted application, all the while continuing to release pollutants in violation of the CWA.
机译:夏威夷野生动物基金会诉毛伊岛县案,第12-00198号,(D。Haw。2014年5月30日)。地方法院裁定,夏威夷州违反《水污染公约》,通过地下水注入井将废水非法排入海洋。一个环保组织起诉该县,试图迫使该县申请并遵守NPDES许可的条款,并对据称非法排放的行为处以民事罚款。此后,该县已申请NPDES许可证。因此,它认为该案应被驳回或搁置,以等待许可申请程序。但是,申请NPDES许可证仅需更多,就不能证明解雇是正当的,更不用说可能漫长或无限期的中止了。否则,污染实体将能够在甚至申请NPDES许可之前花费数年的诉讼时间,然后在延迟提交的申请未决期间寻求将诉讼延期数年,同时继续释放污染物,违反CWA。

著录项

  • 来源
    《National wetlands newsletter》 |2014年第4期|37-38|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:03:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号