首页> 外文期刊>NanoEthics >Peter-Paul Verbeek's Moralizing Technology:Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things Pushing some boundaries
【24h】

Peter-Paul Verbeek's Moralizing Technology:Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things Pushing some boundaries

机译:Peter-Paul Verbeek的道德化技术:理解和设计事物的道德性突破界限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Peter-Paul Verbeek views his book Moralizing Technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things [5] as the beginning of a third turn in the history of modern philosophy of technology. Those who are familiar with Verbeek's philosophy would find it a sequel to his earlier book What Things Do [4]. It was during the last decades of the nineteenth century and the first decades of the twentieth century that philosophizing about technology started to turn from historically incoherent notes into an independent field with its own original questions. In that period, as Verbeek has shown in his What Things Do, philosophers such as Karl Jaspers and Martin Heidegger were concerned about hermeneutic and existential aspects of Technology. The phenomenon of Technology, beyond concrete instances of technological artefacts, was mostly approached as an abstract entity imposing given social and historical orders. Normative judgments about Technology were mostly made on the basis of scenarios that depicted Technology as a great danger to or as a salvation tool for humanity, prescribing a full abandonment or em-bracement of Technology. But then philosophy of technology underwent an empirical turn. From the mid twentieth century up to the end of it phenomenologists such as Merleau-Ponty and Don Ihde, instead of giving general normative judgments about the phenomenon of Technology, investigated concrete cases of human-technology relations and the structures through which technologies mediate human perception of the world. On the analytic side, too, and mostly as a continuation of John Searle's philosophy, philosophers of technology tried to approach metaphysical and epistemological aspects of technological artefacts. Some others started developing theories of technological functions and compared them to theories of biological functions. A second turn, known as the ethical turn, in the history of modern philosophy of technology developed in the first decade of the twenty first century and is the dominating trend.
机译:彼得·保罗·韦贝克(Peter-Paul Verbeek)将他的著作《道德化的技术:理解和设计事物的道德观》 [5]视为现代技术哲学历史上第三轮的开始。那些熟悉Verbeek的哲学的人会发现这是他早期的书What Things Do [4]的续集。正是在19世纪的最后几十年和20世纪的前几十年中,对技术的哲学开始从历史上不连贯的音符转变成一个独立的领域,并提出了自己的原始问题。在那个时期,正如韦尔贝克在《做什么事情》中所展示的那样,卡尔·贾斯珀斯和马丁·海德格尔等哲学家都在关注技术的解释学和存在性方面。除了技术制品的具体实例外,技术现象通常被视为施加给定社会和历史秩序的抽象实体。对技术的规范性判断主要是基于以下场景进行的:将技术描述为对人类的巨大威胁或救赎工具,并规定了对技术的完全抛弃或实施。但是随后,技术哲学经历了一次经验性的转变。从二十世纪中叶到二十世纪末,诸如梅洛-庞蒂和唐·伊德这样的现象学家没有对技术现象做出一般性的判断,而是研究了人与技术之间关系的具体案例,以及技术通过其调解人的感知的结构。世界的。在分析方面,技术哲学家也常常是在约翰·塞尔(John Searle)哲学的延续基础上,尝试研究技术制品的形而上学和认识论方面。其他一些人开始发展技术功能理论,并将其与生物功能理论进行比较。在二十世纪的前十年中发展起来的现代技术哲学史上的第二个转折,即所谓的伦理转折,是主要趋势。

著录项

  • 来源
    《NanoEthics》 |2012年第1期|p.77-80|共4页
  • 作者

    Sadjad Soltanzadeh;

  • 作者单位

    Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics,Canberra, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:51:12

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号