首页> 外文期刊>Monthly Weather Review >3DVAR and Cloud Analysis with WSR-88D Level-Ⅱ Data for the Prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part Ⅱ: Impact of Radial Velocity Analysis via 3DVAR
【24h】

3DVAR and Cloud Analysis with WSR-88D Level-Ⅱ Data for the Prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part Ⅱ: Impact of Radial Velocity Analysis via 3DVAR

机译:使用WSR-88DLevel-Ⅱ数据进行3DVAR和云分析,以预测得克萨斯州沃思堡的飓风雷暴。第二部分:3DVAR对径向速度分析的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this two-part paper, the impact of level-Ⅱ Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) radar reflectivity and radial velocity data on the prediction of a cluster of tornadic thunderstorms in the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) model is studied. Radar reflectivity data are used primarily in a cloud analysis procedure that retrieves the amount of hydrometeors and adjusts in-cloud temperature, moisture, and cloud fields, while radial velocity data are analyzed through a three-dimensional variational (3DVAR) data assimilation scheme that contains a 3D mass divergence constraint in the cost function. In Part I. the impact of the cloud analysis and modifications to the scheme are discussed. In this part, the impact of radial velocity data and the mass divergence constraint in the 3DVAR cost function are studied. The case studied is that of the 28 March 2000 Fort Worth tornadoes. The addition of the radial velocity improves the forecasts beyond that experienced with the cloud analysis alone. The prediction is able to forecast the morphology of individual storm cells on the 3-km grid up to 2 h; the rotating supercell characteristics of the storm that spawned two tornadoes are well captured; timing errors in the forecast are less than 15 min and location errors are less than 10 km at the time of the tornadoes. When forecasts were made with radial velocity assimilation but not reflectivity, they failed to predict nearly all storm cells. Using the current 3DVAR and cloud analysis procedure with 10-min intermittent assimilation cycles, reflectivity data are found to have a greater positive impact than radial velocity. The use of radial velocity does improve the storm forecast when combined with reflectivity assimilation, by, for example, improving the forecasting of the strong low-level vorticity centers associated with the tornadoes. Positive effects of including a mass divergence constraint in the 3DVAR cost function are also documented.
机译:在此由两部分组成的论文中,在高级区域预测系统(ARPS)模型中,对Ⅱ级天气监视雷达1988多普勒(WSR-88D)雷达反射率和径向速度数据的影响是对一场雷暴云的预测的影响。研究。雷达反射率数据主要用于云分析过程中,该过程可检索水凝物的数量并调整云中的温度,湿度和云场,而径向速度数据则通过三维变分(3DVAR)数据同化方案进行分析,该方案包括成本函数中的3D质量差异约束。在第一部分中,讨论了云分析的影响以及对该方案的修改。在这一部分中,研究了径向速度数据和质量散度约束对3DVAR成本函数的影响。研究的案例是2000年3月28日沃思堡龙卷风。径向速度的增加使预测的改进超出了单独进行云分析所获得的预测。该预测能够预测长达3小时的3 km网格上单个风暴细胞的形态;产生了两个龙卷风的风暴的旋转超级单体特征被很好地捕获了;在龙卷风发生时,预报中的时间误差小于15分钟,位置误差小于10 km。当采用径向速度同化而不是反射率进行预测时,他们无法预测几乎所有风暴单元。使用当前的3DVAR和具有10分钟间歇性同化周期的云分析程序,发现反射率数据比径向速度具有更大的积极影响。当与反射率同化结合使用时,径向速度的使用确实改善了风暴预报,例如,通过改进与龙卷风有关的强低空涡旋中心的预报。还记录了在3DVAR成本函数中包括质量差异约束的积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号