首页> 外文期刊>Monthly Weather Review >Field Significance Revisited: Spatial Bias Errors in Forecasts as Applied to the Eta Model
【24h】

Field Significance Revisited: Spatial Bias Errors in Forecasts as Applied to the Eta Model

机译:田间重要性再探:应用于Eta模型的预测中的空间偏差误差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The spatial structure of bias errors in numerical model output is valuable to both model developers and operational forecasters, especially if the field containing the structure itself has statistical significance in the face of naturally occurring spatial correlation. A semiparametric Monte Carlo method, along with a moving blocks bootstrap method is used to determine the field significance of spatial bias errors within spatially correlated error fields. This process can be completely automated, making it an attractive addition to the verification tools already in use. The process demonstrated here results in statistically significant spatial bias error fields at any arbitrary significance level. To demonstrate the technique, 0000 and 1200 UTC runs of the operational Eta Model and the operational Eta Model using the Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization scheme are examined. The resulting fields for forecast errors for geopotential heights and winds at 850, 700, 500, and 250 hPa over a period of 14 months (26 January 2001-31 March 2002) are examined and compared using the verifying initial analysis. Specific examples are shown, and some plausible causes for the resulting significant bias errors are proposed.
机译:数值模型输出中的偏差误差的空间结构对于模型开发人员和运营预测人员均具有价值,特别是如果包含结构本身的字段在面对自然发生的空间相关性时具有统计意义。使用半参数蒙特卡洛方法以及移动块自举方法来确定空间相关误差场中空间偏差误差的场重要性。该过程可以完全自动化,从而使其成为已经使用的验证工具的诱人补充。此处演示的过程将在任何任意显着性水平下产生具有统计意义的空间偏差误差字段。为了演示该技术,研究了使用Ea模型和使用Kain-Fritsch对流参数化方案的Eta模型的0000和1200 UTC运行。在14个月(2001年1月26日至2002年3月31日)内,检查并比较了在850、700、500和250 hPa的地势高度和风的预测误差的结果字段,并使用了经过验证的初始分析。给出了具体示例,并提出了导致明显偏差的一些合理原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号