...
首页> 外文期刊>Molecular Biology and Evolution >An Autosomal Analysis Gives No Genetic Evidence for Complex Speciation of Humans and Chimpanzees
【24h】

An Autosomal Analysis Gives No Genetic Evidence for Complex Speciation of Humans and Chimpanzees

机译:常染色体分析没有提供人类和黑猩猩复杂物种的遗传证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There have been conflicting arguments as to what happened in the human–chimpanzee speciation event. Patterson et al. (2006, Genetic evidence for complex speciation of humans and chimpanzees. Nature 441:1103–1108) proposed a hypothesis that the human–chimpanzee speciation event involved a complicated demographic process: that is, the ancestral lineages of humans and chimpanzees experienced temporal isolation followed by a hybridization event. This hypothesis stemmed from two major observations: a wide range of human–chimpanzee nucleotide divergence across the autosomal genome and very low divergence in the X chromosome. In contrast, Innan and Watanabe (2006, The effect of gene flow on the coalescent time in the human-chimpanzee ancestral population. Mol Biol Evol. 23:1040–1047) demonstrated that the null model of instantaneous speciation fits the genome-wide divergence data for the two species better than alternative models involving partial isolation and migration. To reconcile these two conflicting reports, we first reexamined the analysis of autosomal data by Patterson et al. (2006). By providing a theoretical framework for their analysis, we demonstrated that their observation is what is theoretically expected under the null model of instantaneous speciation with a large ancestral population. Our analysis indicated that the observed wide range of autosomal divergence is simply due to the coalescent process in the large ancestral population of the two species. To further verify this, we developed a maximum likelihood function to detect evidence of hybridization in genome-wide divergence data. Again, the null model with no hybridization best fits the data. We conclude that the simplest speciation model with instantaneous split adequately describes the human–chimpanzee speciation event, and there is no strong reason to involve complicated factors in explaining the autosomal data.speciation, isolation, hybridization, coalescent, human, chimpanzee.
机译:关于人类-黑猩猩物种形成事件发生了什么争论。 Patterson等。 (2006年,人类和黑猩猩的复杂物种形成的遗传证据。自然441:1103-1108)提出了一个假设,认为人类-黑猩猩的物种形成事件涉及复杂的人口统计过程:即人类和黑猩猩的祖先世系经历了暂时的隔离通过杂交事件。这个假设源于两个主要观察结果:常染色体上人类-黑猩猩的核苷酸差异很大,而X染色体的差异非常小。相比之下,Innan和Watanabe(2006年,基因流对人-黑猩猩祖先群体的聚结时间的影响。MolBiol Evol。23:1040–1047)证明,瞬时物种形成的无效模型适合整个基因组的差异。这两个物种的数据优于涉及部分隔离和迁移的替代模型。为了调和这两个矛盾的报告,我们首先重新检查了Patterson等人对常染色体数据的分析。 (2006)。通过为他们的分析提供理论框架,我们证明了他们的观察是理论上在具有大量祖先种群的瞬时物种形成的零模型下的预期结果。我们的分析表明,观察到的广泛的常染色体差异仅是由于两个物种的大量祖先种群的合并过程所致。为了进一步验证这一点,我们开发了最大似然函数来检测全基因组差异数据中杂交的证据。同样,没有杂交的零模型最适合数据。我们得出的结论是,具有瞬时分裂的最简单的物种模型足以描述人-黑猩猩的物种形成事件,并且没有充分的理由在解释常染色体数据中涉及复杂的因素。物种,分离,杂交,合并,人类,黑猩猩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号