...
首页> 外文期刊>Modern Railways >Six-monthly progress report
【24h】

Six-monthly progress report

机译:六月进度报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I'm beginning to wonder whether adding Technical Incidents per 100,000 miles to the table was such a good idea after all. Even when a fleet has to score under five to be borderline respectable, there are some depressingly large numbers as you go down the table. On the other hand, it provides a more direct overview than comparing Miles perTechnical Incident. But begone dull care. For this month I thought I would see if I could find some good news. A fair criticism of TIN-watch is that, while it provides a monthly snapshot of fleet reliability, to find out whether performance is improving you need to get out the back numbers. September's search for bathtub curves showed the best fleets were indeed getting better but covered only selected cases from the five manufacturers.
机译:我开始怀疑每10万英里加入桌子的技术事件是否毕竟是一个好主意。即使舰队必须在五分之下的分数是毗邻赤字中,也有一些令人沮丧的大数字,你走下桌子。另一方面,它提供比比较Miles Pertechnical Infifict的更直接概述。但突然沉闷。本月我以为我会看看我是否能找到一些好消息。对Tin-Watch的公平批评是,虽然它提供了每月快照的舰队可靠性,但要了解性能是否有所改善,您是否需要退出返回数字。九月的搜索浴缸曲线显示,最好的舰队确实越来越好,但只涵盖了五个制造商的选定案例。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Modern Railways》 |2020年第11期|34-36|共3页
  • 作者

    Roger Ford;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号