...
首页> 外文期刊>Modern Railways >Tales from a lost civilisation
【24h】

Tales from a lost civilisation

机译:失去文明的故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

As I reviewed the new edition of the Rail Delivery Group's Key Train Requirements document my life flashed before my eyes. Well, not so much flashed as dawdled, as 165 pages tends more to close my eyes these days. But there it all is, years of good and bad (well, mostly bad) experience of buying trains. British Rail was often criticised for over-specifying trains back in the 1980s. People accused it of being unable to'let go'of the days when it could design, build and maintain, long before it became a new contractual discovery. When I first went to work in the Railway Technical Centre, dragged kicking and screaming from Canton depot, I had a similar mindset. It took some years to learn that'implicit' requirements are not worth the pixels they are written on. In other words, if you don't ask you don't get.
机译:正如我审查了新版本的铁路交付集团的钥匙列车要求文件我的生活在我的眼前闪烁着。好吧,没有如此闪现,如拖延,这几天,165页倾向于闭上眼睛。但这一切都是,多年的好坏(井,大多数不好)购买火车的经验。在20世纪80年代,英国铁轨经常被批评为过度指定的火车。人们指责它无法在它可以设计,建立和维护的日子里才能完成,在它成为新的合同发现之前。当我第一次去铁路技术中心工作时,从广州仓库拖着踢,尖叫,我有类似的心态。需要几年的时间来学习'Evalic'的要求不值得他们写的像素。换句话说,如果你不要求你没有得到。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Modern Railways》 |2020年第8期|40-43|共4页
  • 作者

    Ian Walmsley;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号