In the case of R^sub z^, the situation is particularly complex because it Is one of the oldest surface finish parameters. Unlike R^sub a^, or average roughness, which considers all the peaks and valleys in a sample, R^sub z^ typically looks at only the five highest and five lowest points in a sampling length and averages peak-to-valley distances. Thus, many users consider R^sub z^ more sensitive to actual changes in surface finish than R^sub a^.
展开▼
机译:在R 2的情况下,情况特别复杂,因为它是最古老的表面光洁度参数之一。与考虑样品中所有峰值和谷值的R ^ sub a ^或平均粗糙度不同,R ^ sub z ^通常仅查看采样长度中的五个最高点和五个最低点,并平均峰谷距离。因此,许多用户认为R ^ sub z ^对表面粗糙度的实际变化比R ^ sub a ^更敏感。
展开▼