首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >Can The New Care Quality Commission Divertfunds Upstream, From Acute Hospital care To Prevention And Intervention
【24h】

Can The New Care Quality Commission Divertfunds Upstream, From Acute Hospital care To Prevention And Intervention

机译:新护理质量委员会可以将资金从上游急性病转移到预防和干预吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the last 5 years, funding for the NHS has risen by 7.2% compared to only 2.7% for social care. Over the next 3 years, the NHS will receive real year-on-year increases of 4% compared with only 1% for social care. While there is a great deal of rhetoric around joint working, individual assessments have naturally focused local authorities and PCTs to meeting separate internal targets. While prevention and intervention are high on the policy agenda, funds are directed primarily at acute care. Will a new joined-up regulator create truly joined-up working and provide authorities the backing they need to redirect funds from acute care to prevention and intervention?
机译:在过去的5年中,用于NHS的资金增加了7.2%,而用于社会护理的资金仅为2.7%。在接下来的三年中,NHS的实际同比增长为4%,而社会护理仅为1%。尽管围绕联合工作有很多言辞,但是个人评估自然而然地将地方当局和PCT集中于实现单独的内部目标。尽管预防和干预措施在政策议程中处于首位,但资金主要用于急诊护理。新的联合监管机构是否会创建真正的联合工作,并为当局提供将资金从急诊转移到预防和干预所需的支持?

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2009年第19期|p.22|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 市政工程;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号