首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >Better to be judged by a jury of one's peers
【24h】

Better to be judged by a jury of one's peers

机译:最好由同龄人陪审团判断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It was the great singer Paul Simon who once referred to being judged by ‘a jury of my peers.' It was good enough for him but not it seems for many local authorities who seem reluctant to have their peers tramping through their civic centres. Over the last year just 115 corporate peer reviews were delivered in England of which districts made up just 20% despite their numerical superiority. Some councils have never had a peer challenge in the seven years since the Local Government Association made the offer even though the LGA recommends every council has a peer review every five years. Councils argue the reviews are voluntary so they can ignore them or that they should only apply to failing authorities, presumably those that have already been judged by inspectorates, which rather defeats the object.
机译:曾经是伟大的歌手保罗·西蒙(Paul Simon)曾经提到要由“我的同行陪审团”进行评判。这对他来说已经足够好了,但对许多地方当局似乎却不愿意让他们的同伴在他们的文娱中心中踩踏,似乎还不够。去年,在英格兰仅进行了115次公司同行评议,尽管在数量上具有优势,但其中仅占20%的地区。自地方政府协会提出要约以来的七年中,有些理事会从未遇到过同行挑战,尽管LGA建议每个理事会每五年进行一次同行评审。议会认​​为,这些审查是自愿的,因此可以忽略它们,或者它们仅应适用于失败的主管部门,大概是那些已经由监察机构做出判断的主管部门,而这会挫败该对象。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2018年第6期|10-10|共1页
  • 作者

    Michael Burton;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号