首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >Reclaiming productivity for the sector
【24h】

Reclaiming productivity for the sector

机译:回收该行业的生产力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Having a limited amount of money concentrates the mind. What is absolutely essential? Can I get better deals on what I need to buy? Can I do more but without spending extra - by getting more out of myself and my team? What can I cut - and still survive?In the private sector, these types of decisions are straightforward. You can measure the value of what you're producing by the price you can charge. Ultimately, this reduces all your inputs, investments and innovation, and outputs and outcomes, to a single measure - pounds and pence. This helps you to compare your options, and allows you to measure yourself against your competitors.In the public sector, such comparisons are more difficult to make. The absence of a price mechanism means that 'what good looks like' is open to interpretation (and is therefore in constant dispute). Each organisation makes their own choices every year - a series of compromises balancing politics, fine judgment, financial limits, behaviour of partners, and delivery risk. Put simply, leaders often have to fudge things just to get by.
机译:拥有有限的金钱可以集中精力。绝对必要的是什么?我可以在需要购买的商品上得到更好的优惠吗?我可以做更多但又不花更多钱的事情吗?我能削减什么并仍然生存?在私营部门,这些类型的决定很简单。您可以通过可以收取的价格来衡量所生产产品的价值。最终,这可以将您所有的投入,投资和创新以及产出和成果减少到一个衡量标准-磅和便士。这可以帮助您比较选择,并使您能够与竞争对手进行比较。在公共部门,这样的比较比较困难。价格机制的缺乏意味着“好看的样子”易于解释(因此一直存在争议)。每个组织每年都会做出自己的选择-在平衡政治,明智的判断,财务限制,合作伙伴的行为和交付风险之间进行一系列折衷。简而言之,领导者常常不得不捏造事物以求生存。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2018年第14期|Ⅲ-Ⅲ|共1页
  • 作者

    Jon Ainger;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号