...
首页> 外文期刊>Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change >Global warming potential factors and warming payback time as climate indicators of forest biomass use
【24h】

Global warming potential factors and warming payback time as climate indicators of forest biomass use

机译:全球变暖的潜在因素和变暖的回报时间是森林生物质利用的气候指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A method is presented for estimating the global warming impact of forest biomass life cycles with respect to their functionally equivalent alternatives based on fossil fuels and non-renewable material sources. In the method, absolute global warming potentials (AGWP) of both the temporary carbon (C) debt of forest biomass stock and the C credit of the biomass use cycle displacing the fossil and non-renewable alternative are estimated as a function of the time frame of climate change mitigation. Dimensionless global warming potential (GWP) factors, GWPbio and GWPbiouse, are derived. As numerical examples, 1) bioenergy from boreal forest harvest residues to displace fossil fuels and 2) the use of wood for material substitution are considered. The GWP-based indicator leads to longer payback times, i.e. the time frame needed for the biomass option to be superior to its fossil-based alternative, than when just the cumulative balance of biogenic and fossil C stocks is considered. The warming payback time increases substantially with the residue diameter and low displacement factor (DF) of fossil C emissions. For the 35-cm stumps, the payback time appears to be more than 100 years in the climate conditions of Southern Finland when DF is lower than 0.5 in instant use and lower than 0.6 in continuous stump use. Wood use for construction appears to be more beneficial because, in addition to displaced emissions due to by-product bioenergy and material substitution, a significant part of round wood is sequestered into wood products for a long period, and even a zero payback time would be attainable with reasonable DFs.
机译:提出了一种方法,相对于基于化石燃料和不可再生材料来源的功能等效替代品,估算森林生物质生命周期对全球变暖的影响。在该方法中,根据时间框架,估算了森林生物质储量的临时碳(C)债务和替代化石和不可再生替代物的生物质使用周期的C信用的绝对全球变暖潜能(AGWP)缓解气候变化。推导了无量纲的全球变暖潜势因子GWPbio 和GWPbiouse 。作为数值示例,考虑了1)来自北方森林采伐残余物的生物能源来替代化石燃料,以及2)使用木材替代材料。基于全球升温潜能值的指标导致更长的投资回收期,即与仅考虑生物基因和化石碳储量的累积平衡时相比,生物质能方案要优于其基于化石的替代方案所需的时间框架。随着化石碳排放的残留物直径和低位移因子(DF),回暖时间显着增加。对于35厘米的树桩,在立即使用时DF低于0.5而在连续树桩使用中DF低于0.6的情况下,在芬兰南部的气候条件下,投资回收期似乎超过100年。建筑用木材似乎更有益,因为除了由于副产品生物能源和材料替代产生的排放量外,很长一段时间以来,很大一部分原木都被封存成木制品,甚至零回收期也将是零成本。用合理的DF可以达到的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号