...
首页> 外文期刊>Minerva >Science Advice as Procedural Rationality: Reflections on the National Research Council
【24h】

Science Advice as Procedural Rationality: Reflections on the National Research Council

机译:科学建议作为程序合理性:对国家研究委员会的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since its founding in 1863, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) has occupied a special niche in the complex ecology of advice-giving in the United States. Established as a small, private organization with special responsibilities and obligations vis à vis the American people and government, the Academy has expanded considerably in the past century and a half and now releases, through the National Research Council (NRC), its operating arm, more than 200 reports per year, on topics covering nearly the entire range of science, engineering, health, and education. The development of the organization, its basic ethos, and its evolving structures and processes can be seen as examples of what Herbert Simon called “procedural rationality”: the pursuit of reasonably good solutions to complex problems based on appropriate deliberation.
机译:自1863年成立以来,美国国家科学院(NAS)在美国复杂的咨询生态系统中占据了特殊的位置。该学院是一家小型的私人组织,对美国人民和政府负有特殊的责任和义务,该学院在过去的一个半世纪中得到了很大的发展,现在通过其国家研究委员会(NRC)发行,每年有200多份报告,涉及的主题几乎涵盖了科学,工程,健康和教育的所有领域。该组织的发展,其基本精神,及其不断发展的结构和过程都可以看作是赫伯特·西蒙(Herbert Simon)所称的“过程理性”的例子:在适当的审议基础上,为复杂问题寻求合理的好的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号