首页> 外文期刊>Mind & Society >Perturbation theory in cognitive socio-scientific research: towards sociological economic analysis
【24h】

Perturbation theory in cognitive socio-scientific research: towards sociological economic analysis

机译:认知社会科学研究中的摄动理论:走向社会经济学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The question posed is whether the optimization methods of calculus that are often used in social and scientific analyses offer an appropriate analytical approach to analyze problems that are immersed in systemic complexity and its consequences. This paper refers to the portfolio of such complex problems belonging to social and scientific forces. We refer to such a complex combination by the term ‘socio-scientific’. In the study of socio-scientific complexity, dynamic preferences, intricate decisions, and uncertain behavior, endogenous relations and systemic perturbations abound. The arguments presented in this paper establish that the methodological approach of optimization and steady-state equilibrium turns out to be nicety rather than objectivity in the presence of complexity. Complex situations of the socio-scientific universe cause perturbations in the variables; there explaining complexity formed by the social embedding of variables. Indeed, human individuals, institutions and governments, and society at large are complex interrelated entities. Therefore, complex interrelations caused by social embedding remain submerged in social perturbations. However, interactions arising from social embedding (the cause of interrelations between variables) also generate endogenous and complex relations. The contribution of this paper is in the area of endogenous learning in the wellbeing objective criterion function. The interrelationships between the emergent cognitive variables now cause interactive embedding, complexity, and social perturbations. Yet such perturbations are not altogether uncontrollable. They can be and need to be controlled for the purposes of social explanation—hence demanding predictability—even as the complex nature of evolutionary systemic learning proceeds. The controllability problem of extreme perturbations leads us to formalize a mathematical methodology to study controllable perturbations while avoiding extreme forms of perturbations in socio-scientific theory.
机译:提出的问题是,社会和科学分析中经常使用的微积分优化方法是否提供了一种适当的分析方法来分析陷入系统复杂性及其后果的问题。本文涉及属于社会和科学力量的此类复杂问题。我们将这种复杂的组合称为“社会科学”一词。在对社会科学复杂性的研究中,动态偏好,错综复杂的决策和不确定的行为,内生关系和系统扰动比比皆是。本文提出的论点证明,在存在复杂性的情况下,优化和稳态平衡的方法论方法证明是很好而不是客观的。社会科学宇宙的复杂情况引起变量的扰动;在那里解释了变量的社会嵌入所形成的复杂性。实际上,个人,机构和政府以及整个社会都是复杂的相互关联的实体。因此,由社会嵌入引起的复杂相互关系仍然淹没在社会动荡之中。但是,由于社会嵌入(变量之间相互关系的原因)引起的相互作用也产生了内在的和复杂的关系。本文的贡献在于内在学习领域的幸福目标标准功能。现在,出现的认知变量之间的相互关系导致互动嵌入,复杂性和社会动荡。然而,这种干扰并非完全不可控制。出于社会解释的目的(因此要求可预测性),可以甚至需要对它们进行控制,即使进化的系统性学习的复杂性不断发展也是如此。极端摄动的可控制性问题使我们正式化了一种数学方法,以研究可控摄动,同时避免了社会科学理论中的极端摄动形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号