...
首页> 外文期刊>Microelectronics & Reliability >A holistic comparison of the different resampling algorithms for particle filter based prognosis using lithium ion batteries as a case study
【24h】

A holistic comparison of the different resampling algorithms for particle filter based prognosis using lithium ion batteries as a case study

机译:基于粒子过滤器的锂离子电池预后的不同重采样算法的整体比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Prognostic health management (PHM) is a critical and essential aspect of any robust maintenance program in the manufacturing industry for early failure detection and prediction of the remaining useful life (RUL) for the entire system or for a component (sub-system) whose condition is being monitored in real-time. In recent years, a lot of research has been done on developing better performing prognostic algorithms for RUL prediction with the "particle filter (PF)" framework being the most widely used amongst them. To address the problems of particle degeneracy and particle impoverishment, several adaptations of standard particle filters have been proposed by improvising the resampling strategies. However, the efficacy of these algorithms is assessed only under specific conditions involving relatively clean degradation data (low noise), large training data sets and limited degradation patterns (mostly linear or "almost" linear). The purpose of this study is to make a comparison of four most frequently used resampling strategies: Multinomial resampling, Stratified resampling, Systematic resampling and Residual Systematic resampling for lithium-ion battery RUL prediction. They are similar in terms of operation but differ only in the way the ordered sequence of random numbers is generated for resampling thus enabling a standardized comparison in terms of computational complexity of O(N). The robustness of these resampling techniques is tested by adding 50 dB of noise to the measurement data and by considering three different time instants at different stages of the device lifecycle for prediction with different amount of training data. We use the mean squared deviation (MSD), relative accuracy (RA), execution time and the alpha - lambda plot as the performance metrics for comparing the effectiveness of the different resampling techniques. Our analysis shows that the residual systematic resampling algorithm is the most preferred approach considering the reasonable accuracy and short computational time.
机译:预测性健康管理(PHM)是制造业中任何强大的维护程序的关键和重要方面,用于早期故障检测和预测整个系统或组件(子系统)的剩余使用寿命(RUL)正在实时监控。近年来,在“粒子滤波(PF)”框架中,使用最广泛的方法为RUL预测开发性能更好的预后算法方面已进行了大量研究。为了解决粒子退化和粒子贫乏的问题,通过改进重采样策略,提出了几种标准粒子滤波器的改编方案。但是,仅在涉及相对干净的降级数据(低噪声),大型训练数据集和有限的降级模式(大多数为线性或“几乎”线性)的特定条件下评估这些算法的有效性。这项研究的目的是比较四种最常用的重采样策略:多项重采样,分层重采样,系统重采样和用于锂离子电池RUL预测的残余系统重采样。它们在操作上相似,但仅在生成随机数的有序序列以进行重采样方面有所不同,因此就O(N)的计算复杂度而言实现了标准化比较。通过将50 dB的噪声添加到测量数据,并考虑在设备生命周期的不同阶段使用三个不同的瞬时时间来预测不同数量的训练数据,可以测试这些重采样技术的鲁棒性。我们使用均方差(MSD),相对精度(RA),执行时间和alpha-lambda图作为性能指标,用于比较不同重采样技术的有效性。我们的分析表明,考虑到合理的准确性和较短的计算时间,残差系统重采样算法是最可取的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号