首页> 外文期刊>Metals and Materials International >Analysis and estimation of yield strength of API X80 linepipe steel pipe by low-cycle fatigue tests
【24h】

Analysis and estimation of yield strength of API X80 linepipe steel pipe by low-cycle fatigue tests

机译:API X80管线管钢管低周疲劳试验的屈服强度分析与估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the present study, spiral piping was conducted on API X80 linepipe steel, and the outer and inner wall pipe yield strengths were measured. A low-cycle fatigue test was conducted on a leveled X80 steel sheet to simulate piping and flattening processes, and the strain hardening and Bauschinger effects, induced from different strain histories, were evaluated and combined using Swift’s equation and the Bauschinger stress parameter, respectively. By analyzing the stress-strain curves obtained from the low-cycle fatigue test, the yield strengths of the outer and inner walls were estimated to be 592 MPa and 492 MPa, respectively, which are lower by 20–80 MPa than that of the actual pipe used. Possible reasons for measured and estimated yield strength differences could be the simulation determining procedure of the pre-strain and Bauschinger stress parameters, preposition of same strain hardening behavior depending on strain history, and pre-strain differences depending on thickness location in the steel sheet during piping.
机译:在本研究中,对API X80管线钢进行了螺旋管道输送,并测量了内外壁管道的屈服强度。在矫直的X80钢板上进行了低周疲劳测试,以模拟管道和扁平化过程,并分别评估了由不同应变历史引起的应变硬化和包辛格效应,并分别使用Swift方程和包辛格应力参数进行了组合。通过分析低周疲劳试验获得的应力-应变曲线,外壁和内壁的屈服强度分别为592 MPa和492 MPa,比实际值低20–80 MPa。使用的管道。测得和估计的屈服强度差异的可能原因可能是预应变和包辛格应力参数的模拟确定程序,取决于应变历史的相同应变硬化行为的预设,以及取决于钢板在加工过程中钢板厚度位置的预应变差异管道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号