首页> 外文期刊>Mental Health, Religion & Culture >Spirituality and secularity: professional boundaries in psychiatry
【24h】

Spirituality and secularity: professional boundaries in psychiatry

机译:灵性与世俗:精神病学的专业界限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Spirituality is assuming increasing importance in clinical practice and in research in psychiatry. This increasing salience of spirituality raises important questions about the boundaries of good professional practice. Answers to these questions require not only careful attention to defining and understanding the nature of spirituality, but also closer attention to the nature of concepts of secularity and self than psychiatry has usually given. Far from being “neutral ground,” secularity is inherently biased against concepts of transcendence. Our secular age is preoccupied with a form of immanence that emphasises interiority, autonomy and reason, but this preoccupation has paradoxically been associated with an explosion of interest in the transcendent in new, often non-religious and non-traditional forms. This context, as well as the increasing evidence base for spiritual and religious coping as important ways of dealing with mental stress and mental disorder, requires that psychiatry gives more careful attention to the ways in which people find meaning in spirituality and religion. This in turn requires that more clinical attention be routinely given to spiritual history taking and the incorporation of spiritual considerations in treatment planning.View full textDownload full textKeywordsspirituality, religion, secularity, self, boundaries, psychiatryRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2010.484935
机译:在临床实践和精神病学研究中,灵性正变得越来越重要。不断提高的精神修养引起了关于良好职业实践界限的重要问题。要回答这些问题,不仅需要仔细关注定义和理解灵性的本质,而且还需要比精神病学更关注世俗和自我概念的本质。世俗性远非“中立”,天生就倾向于超越概念。我们的世俗时代全神贯注于一种强调内在性,自治性和理性的内在性形式,但是这种超然性与超验者对以新的,通常是非宗教的和非传统形式的兴趣激增相关。在这种情况下,以及作为应对精神压力和精神障碍的重要方法,越来越多的精神和宗教应对方法的证据基础,要求精神病学更加仔细地关注人们在灵性和宗教中发现意义的方式。反过来,这又需要常规地更多地关注精神病史的接受以及将精神因素纳入治疗计划中。在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2010.484935

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号