首页> 外文期刊>Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science >A Comparison of Physical Self-Perception Profile Questionnaire Formats: Structured Alternative and Ordered Response Scale Formats
【24h】

A Comparison of Physical Self-Perception Profile Questionnaire Formats: Structured Alternative and Ordered Response Scale Formats

机译:身体自我感知概况问卷格式的比较:结构化替代和有序响应量表格式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study assessed the performance of the original version of the Physical Self-Perception Profile (PSPP; Fox & Corbin, 1989) as compared to a revised version. University students (N = 259) participated in the study, each answering and comparing the clarity of the original and a revised PSPP. While participants found the revised version to be significantly clearer, it performed similarly to the original in select analyses of internal consistency and construct validity. The original structured alternative format did not have lower levels of socially desirable responding, as compared to the Likert-type ordered response scale format of the revised PSPP. Because the revised version was deemed clearer, performed similarly to the original on select psychometric analyses, and did not have any data loss, there is merit in further examining additional validity and reliability evidence for the revised PSPP.
机译:这项研究评估了原始版本的“自我感觉自我概况”(PSPP; Fox&Corbin,1989)与修订版的性能。大学生(N = 259)参加了该研究,每个人都回答并比较了原始和修订的PSPP的清晰度。尽管参与者发现修订版本明显更清晰,但在内部一致性和结构效度的精选分析中,其表现与原始版本相似。与修订版PSPP的Likert型有序回应量表格式相比,原始的结构化替代格式没有较低的社会合意响应水平。由于修订版被认为更清晰,在某些心理计量学分析中与原始版本相似,并且没有任何数据丢失,因此有必要进一步检查修订版PSPP的其他有效性和可靠性证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号