...
首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical Problems in Engineering >Multiperiod Production and Ordering Policies for a Retailer-Led Supply Chain through Option Contracts
【24h】

Multiperiod Production and Ordering Policies for a Retailer-Led Supply Chain through Option Contracts

机译:通过期权合同的零售商主导的供应链的多周期生产和订购策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper formulates two groups ofmultiperiod production and orderingmodels with call and bidirectional option contracts for a two-party supply chain consisting of one followed supplier and one dominant retailer, respectively. Based on dynamic programming theory, we characterize the optimal policy structures for two partners in each period. We also provide an approximation for the corresponding policy parameters evaluation in two cases. Then, we investigate the impacts of different option contracts and the demand risk on the decisions and performances of twomembers. Our results suggest that, whether concerning call or bidirectional option contracts, the optimal policies for two members always follow a base stock type. When the price parameters are the same for different option contracts, the service levels of both the system and the retailer are higher with call option contracts than with bidirectional ones, whereas the retailer's inventory risk is lower with bidirectional option contracts than with call ones. Under the same conditions stated above, call option contracts can always benefit the supplier, but not the retailer. Owing to the retailer's dominant position, call option contracts are better choice for the supply chain if the option (exercise) price is low (high), while bidirectional option contracts are more suitable choice for the supply chain if the option (exercise) price is high (low). In addition, an increase in the demand risk would prompt the supplier to increase his production quantity and the retailer to reduce the initial firm order quantity, either with call or bidirectional option contracts.
机译:本文针对两方供应链(分别由一个跟随供应商和一个主要零售商组成)建立了两组具有看涨期权和双向期权合约的多周期生产和订购模型。基于动态规划理论,我们描述了每个时期两个合作伙伴的最优政策结构。在两种情况下,我们还为相应的策略参数评估提供了近似值。然后,我们研究了不同期权合约和需求风险对两个成员的决策和绩效的影响。我们的结果表明,无论涉及看涨期权合约还是双向期权合约,两个成员的最优策略始终遵循基本股票类型。当不同期权合约的价格参数相同时,使用双向期权合约的系统和零售商的服务水平均高于双向期权,而双向期权合约的零售商的库存风险则低于双向期权。在上述相同条件下,看涨期权合同总能使供应商受益,但对零售商却没有好处。由于零售商的主导地位,如果期权(执行)价格低(高),则看涨期权合约是供应链的更好选择,而如果期权(执行)价格为零,则双向期权合约更适合于供应链。前高后低)。另外,需求风险的增加将促使供应商增加其生产数量,而零售商则减少初始的定单数量(通过看涨期权合约或双向期权合约)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Mathematical Problems in Engineering》 |2018年第4期|9097136.1-9097136.17|共17页
  • 作者

    Wan Nana; Chen Xu;

  • 作者单位

    Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Mianyang 621010, Peoples R China;

    Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号