...
首页> 外文期刊>Materials & design >A Comparison Of Low Carbon Steel And Al-mg Alloy Sheets In Quasi-static Tearing Collisions
【24h】

A Comparison Of Low Carbon Steel And Al-mg Alloy Sheets In Quasi-static Tearing Collisions

机译:低碳钢和铝镁合金板准静态撕裂碰撞的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Through tearing test, the absorbed energy of a low carbon steel and an Al-Mg alloy sheets are compared. The tests are carried out quasi-statically using the wedge tools with different angles. Also, the effects of the inclination angle of sheet to vertical and angle between normal to sheet and edge of wedge are investigated on the energy absorption of both the steel and aluminum alloy. The results show that with increasing the later angles, the absorbed energy is decreased and with increasing the wedge angle, the energy is increased. Comparing the absorbed energy of the sheets with the same thicknesses, it is found that the energy absorption of the steel is higher than that of the aluminum alloy in mean value of 71%. Moreover, the absorbed energy of the aluminum alloy sheet of 2 mm thickness is placed between the absorbed energy of the steel sheets of 1 mm and 2 mm thicknesses. It is concluded that the absorbed energy of the aluminum alloy sheet of 2 mm thickness is the same as that of the steel sheet of 1.46 mm thickness.
机译:通过撕裂试验,比较了低碳钢和Al-Mg合金板的吸收能。使用具有不同角度的楔形工具准静态地进行测试。同样,研究了钢板相对于垂直方向的倾斜角度以及垂直于钢板与楔形边缘的角度对钢和铝合金能量吸收的影响。结果表明,随着后角的增加,吸收的能量减少,而随着楔角的增加,能量增加。比较具有相同厚度的板的吸收能量,发现钢的能量吸收平均值为71%,高于铝合金。另外,将2mm厚的铝合金薄板的吸收能量置于1mm厚和2mm厚的钢板的吸收能量之间。可以得出结论,厚度为2 mm的铝合金板的吸收能量与厚度为1.46 mm的钢板的吸收能量相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号