首页> 外文期刊>Marketing Science >Practice Prize Winner—A Nested Logit Model of Product and Transaction-Type Choice for Planning Automakers' Pricing and Promotions
【24h】

Practice Prize Winner—A Nested Logit Model of Product and Transaction-Type Choice for Planning Automakers' Pricing and Promotions

机译:实践奖得主-用于计划汽车制造商定价和促销的产品和交易类型选择的嵌套Logit模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We develop a consumer response model to evaluate and plan pricing and promotions in durable-good markets. We discuss its implementation in the U.S. automotive industry, which "spends" about $45 billion each year in price promotions. The approach is based on a random effects multinomial nested logit model of product (e.g., a vehicle model, such as Hyundai Tucson), and transaction-type choice. Transaction types include combinations of acquisition types (e.g., purchase versus lease) and pricing instruments (cash rebates, reduced APR financing, lease payment discounts). We estimate the model using hierarchical Bayes methods to capture response heterogeneity at the local market level. We find key characteristics unique to durable-good markets. First, consumers are heterogeneous in both their brand and transaction-type preferences. Second, consumers differ in their overall price sensitivity as well as in their relative sensitivity to alternative pricing instruments (e.g., cash discounts, reduced monthly payments). Third, the most effective pricing programs tend to be those in which automakers offer consumers a menu of options to choose from (e.g., a choice among a cash discount, reduced interest rate financing, or a lease payment discount). We illustrate the model through an empirical application to a sample of data drawn from J.D. Power transaction records in the entry SUV segment and discuss examples of actual implementations.
机译:我们开发了一个消费者响应模型来评估和计划耐用品市场中的定价和促销。我们将讨论其在美国汽车行业的实施情况,该行业每年“花费”约450亿美元进行价格促销。该方法基于产品的随机效应多项式嵌套logit模型(例如,车辆模型,例如Hyundai Tucson)和交易类型选择。交易类型包括收购类型(例如,购买与租赁)和定价工具(现金返还,减少的APR融资,租赁付款折扣)的组合。我们使用分级贝叶斯方法估计模型,以捕获本地市场水平的响应异质性。我们发现耐用品市场独有的关键特征。首先,消费者在品牌偏好和交易类型偏好上都是不同的。其次,消费者在总体价格敏感性以及对替代定价工具的相对敏感性方面存在差异(例如,现金折扣,减少的每月付款)。第三,最有效的定价程序往往是汽车制造商向消费者提供菜单选项的选择(例如,在现金折扣,降低利率的融资或租赁付款折扣中选择)。我们将通过经验应用对从入门SUV细分中的J.D. Power交易记录中提取的数据样本进行示例性说明,并讨论实际实施示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号