首页> 外文期刊>Marine Technology Society journal >Marine Sound Pollution: Does It Merit Concern?
【24h】

Marine Sound Pollution: Does It Merit Concern?

机译:海洋声污染:值得关注吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The possible effects on marine mammals and other marine organisms of sound from human (anthropogenic) sources have become subjects of increasing concern and controversy. In the late 1970s and 1980s, the sources of principal concern were seismic profiling, drilling, and related activities associated with offshore oil and gas development. In the last decade, much of the focus has shifted to activities conducted or supported by the U.S. Navy, most notably the Acoustic Thermometry of Ocean Climate Program, ship-shock tests, development and proposed use of low frequency active sonar to detect new classes of quiet submarines, and the stranding of beaked whales and other cetaceans in the Bahamas in March 2000 coincident with antisubmarine exercises involving use of mid-frequency tactical sonars. There has been substantial controversy concerning the possible impacts of these activities, and a number of law suits seeking to stop or restrict them. The Navy believes that the concerns are unwarranted and that the law suits have impeded its ability to meet its national defense responsibilities. Congress agreed and in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-87) made two substantial changes to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA): (1) it authorized the Secretary of Defense to exempt military readiness activities from the provisions of the MMPA governing the incidental taking of marine mammals; and (2) it added to the Act separate definitions of harassment to apply to such activities. These and other proposed changes to the MMPA could undermine the unique, precautionary or risk-averse philosophy of the Act. An alternative, two-step approach, advocated in this paper, would be to (a) revise the definition of harassment to clearly differentiate types and levels of behavioral disturbance likely to have, and not to have, biologically significant effects; and (b) add a general authorization for all incidental taking expected to have biologically insignificant effects, similar to the general authorization for marine mammal research expected to have biologically insignificant effects added to the MMPA in 1994.
机译:人类(人为)来源产生的声音对海洋哺乳动物和其他海洋生物的可能影响已成为越来越多的关注和争议的话题。在1970年代末和1980年代末,主要关注的问题是地震剖面,钻井以及与海上油气开发有关的相关活动。在过去的十年中,大部分关注点已转移到美国海军进行或支持的活动上,其中最著名的是海洋气候计划声波测温,船舶冲击试验,低频有源声纳的开发以及拟议中的使用低频有源声纳来探测新类别的声纳。安静的潜水艇,以及2000年3月在巴哈马搁浅的喙鲸和其他鲸类动物,以及涉及使用中频战术声纳的反潜演习。关于这些活动可能产生的影响,存在着广泛的争议,许多法律诉讼试图制止或限制它们。海军认为,这些担忧是没有根据的,诉讼已阻碍了其履行国防职责的能力。国会同意,并且在《 2004财政年度国防授权法》(第108-87号公法)中对《海洋哺乳动物保护法》(MMPA)进行了两项重大修改:(1)它授权国防部长免除军事准备活动。 MMPA的规定,涉及对海洋哺乳动物的意外捕捞; (2)它在该法中增加了单独的骚扰定义,以适用于此类活动。 MMPA的这些和其他提议的更改可能会破坏该法案的独特,预防或规避风险的理念。本文提倡的另一种分两步走的方法是:(a)修改骚扰的定义,以清楚地区分可能具有或不具有生物学上显着影响的行为干扰的类型和水平; (b)为所有预期具有生物学上无意义的影响的附带事件增加一项通用授权,类似于对1994年MMPA中预期具有生物学上无意义的影响的海洋哺乳动物研究的总体授权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号