首页> 外文期刊>Marine policy >The Magnuson-Stevens act (1976) and its reauthorizations: Failure or success for the implementation of fishery sustainability and management in the US?
【24h】

The Magnuson-Stevens act (1976) and its reauthorizations: Failure or success for the implementation of fishery sustainability and management in the US?

机译:Magnuson-Stevens法案(1976年)及其重新授权:在美国实施渔业可持续性和管理的成功与否?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (1976), opened a new era of federal fishery management in the United States. It was enacted primarily to establish a system for conserving and managing fisheries in the new 200-mile (EEZ). The US assumed exclusive authority for managing all fisheries within the EEZ, except for highly migratory species such as tunas and billfishes. Within the framework of the Act, eight Regional Fishery Management Councils (Regional Councils) were created, which are responsible for preparing Fisheries Management Plans (FMPs) in federal waters under their jurisdiction. Each FMP must meet a series of National Standards (NSs) for conservation and manage ment. The Act was reauthorized in 1996 with the passage of the Sustainable Fisheries Act (SFA), which aimed at fine tuning the fishery regulatory apparatus that was established under the original Act. This "fine tuning" involved increased attention to biological concerns, and removal of ambiguities within it. The Act was reauthorized again in 2007, mainly to provide for more clear directives and regulations to end overfishing. After more than thirty years since the Act was passed into law, the debate among conservationists, commercial and recreational fishery representatives, and politicians on the effective ness of the Act in achieving its purported goals it still continues. Is the Act delivering on its promises? Do NSs reflect the most important priorities for the US fishery resources, conservation and sustainable exploitation? Do the Regional Councils represent all parties that should be involved in the fisheries resources management? The aim of this paper is to provide a critical analysis to answer these questions. This paper begins with a review of the Act and its background, followed by discussion and analysis of the Act's benefits and flaws. Finally, suggestions for the implementation of its structure and future directions in fishery management strategies are made.
机译:《马格努森-史蒂文斯渔业养护和管理法》(1976年)开启了美国联邦渔业管理的新纪元。颁布该法规主要是为了建立一个新的200英里(EEZ)渔业保护和管理系统。美国拥有专属经济区的所有渔业管理权,金枪鱼和and鱼等高度迁徙物种除外。在该法案的框架内,成立了八个区域渔业管理委员会(地区委员会),负责在其管辖的联邦水域中制定渔业管理计划(FMP)。每个FMP必须满足一系列有关保护和管理的国家标准(NSs)。该法案于1996年通过了《可持续渔业法案》(SFA),从而获得了重新授权,该法案旨在细调根据原始法案建立的渔业监管机构。这种“微调”涉及对生物学问题的更多关注,并消除了其中的歧义。该法令于2007年再次获得授权,主要是为了提供更明确的指示和规章制止过度捕捞。该法案通过成为法律已有30多年了,环境保护主义者,商业和休闲渔业代表以及政治家之间就该法案在实现其声称的目标方面的有效性进行了辩论。该法案是否履行了诺言? NS是否反映了美国渔业资源,保护和可持续开发的最重要优先事项?区域理事会是否代表应参与渔业资源管理的所有各方?本文的目的是提供一个批判性分析来回答这些问题。本文首先回顾该法及其背景,然后讨论和分析该法的利弊。最后,提出了在渔业管理战略中实施其结构和未来方向的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号